Meta‐analysis of the predictive value of C‐reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery. Issue 6 (16th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Meta‐analysis of the predictive value of C‐reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery. Issue 6 (16th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Meta‐analysis of the predictive value of C‐reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery
- Authors:
- Adamina, M.
Steffen, T.
Tarantino, I.
Beutner, U.
Schmied, B. M.
Warschkow, R. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9756-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0001">The aim of this analysis was to assess the predictive value of C‐reactive protein (CRP) for the early detection of postoperative infectious complications after a variety of abdominal operations.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0002">A meta‐analysis of seven cohort studies from a single institution was performed. Laparoscopic gastric bypass and colectomies, as well as open resections of cancer of the colon, rectum, pancreas, stomach and oesophagus, were included. The predictive value of CRP was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0003">Of 1986 patients, 577 (29·1 (95 per cent c.i. 27·1 to 31·3) per cent) had at least one postoperative infectious complication. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (383 patients) or colectomy (285), and those having open gastric (97) or colorectal (934) resections were combined in a meta‐analysis. Patients who had resection for cancer of the oesophagus (41) or pancreas (246) were analysed separately owing to heterogeneity. CRP levels 4 days after surgery had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0·76, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 0·78).<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9756-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0001">The aim of this analysis was to assess the predictive value of C‐reactive protein (CRP) for the early detection of postoperative infectious complications after a variety of abdominal operations.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0002">A meta‐analysis of seven cohort studies from a single institution was performed. Laparoscopic gastric bypass and colectomies, as well as open resections of cancer of the colon, rectum, pancreas, stomach and oesophagus, were included. The predictive value of CRP was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0003">Of 1986 patients, 577 (29·1 (95 per cent c.i. 27·1 to 31·3) per cent) had at least one postoperative infectious complication. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (383 patients) or colectomy (285), and those having open gastric (97) or colorectal (934) resections were combined in a meta‐analysis. Patients who had resection for cancer of the oesophagus (41) or pancreas (246) were analysed separately owing to heterogeneity. CRP levels 4 days after surgery had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0·76, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 0·78). Sensitivity and specificity were 68·5 (60·6 to 75·5) and 71·6 (66·6 to 76·0) per cent respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 50·4 (46·0 to 54·8) and 84·3 (80·8 to 87·3) per cent. The threshold CRP varied according to the procedure performed.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9756-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p id="bjs9756-para-0004">The negative predictive value of serum CRP concentration on day 4 after surgery facilitates reliable exclusion of postoperative infectious complications.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 102:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0102-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 590
- Page End:
- 598
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-16
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9756 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4185.xml