Evaluation of Older Adult Patients With Falls in the Emergency Department: Discordance With National Guidelines. (13th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of Older Adult Patients With Falls in the Emergency Department: Discordance With National Guidelines. (13th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of Older Adult Patients With Falls in the Emergency Department: Discordance With National Guidelines
- Authors:
- Tirrell, Gregory
Sri‐on, Jiraporn
Lipsitz, Lewis A.
Camargo, Carlos A.
Kabrhel, Christopher
Liu, Shan W.
Shah, Manish N. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="acem12634-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The objective was to examine whether the emergency department (ED) evaluation of older adult fallers is concordant with the Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This study was a chart review of randomly selected older adult ED fall patients from one urban academic teaching hospital. Patients 65 years and older who had ED fall visits in 2012 and who had primary care physicians within our hospital network during the past 3 years were included. Transferred patients were excluded. The data collection instrument was adapted from ED fall evaluation recommendations.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were 350 patients in this study. The mean (±SD) patient age was 80.1 (±8.8) years, 124 (35%) were male, 327 (93%) were white, and 298 (85%) were community dwelling. The range with which history and physical examination findings were concordant with fall guidelines was 1% to 85%. Cause and location of fall were the two most frequently reported history items (85 and 81%, respectively), while asking about baseline vision was only reported 1% of the time. Evaluating for sensory deficits and muscle strength were the two most frequently reported physical examinations (63 and 48%,<abstract abstract-type="main" id="acem12634-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The objective was to examine whether the emergency department (ED) evaluation of older adult fallers is concordant with the Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This study was a chart review of randomly selected older adult ED fall patients from one urban academic teaching hospital. Patients 65 years and older who had ED fall visits in 2012 and who had primary care physicians within our hospital network during the past 3 years were included. Transferred patients were excluded. The data collection instrument was adapted from ED fall evaluation recommendations.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were 350 patients in this study. The mean (±SD) patient age was 80.1 (±8.8) years, 124 (35%) were male, 327 (93%) were white, and 298 (85%) were community dwelling. The range with which history and physical examination findings were concordant with fall guidelines was 1% to 85%. Cause and location of fall were the two most frequently reported history items (85 and 81%, respectively), while asking about baseline vision was only reported 1% of the time. Evaluating for sensory deficits and muscle strength were the two most frequently reported physical examinations (63 and 48%, respectively), while balance was evaluated with the lowest frequency (1%). Patients who received more guideline‐recommended evaluations were older with more comorbid conditions and were transferred to an observation unit or admitted to the hospital more frequently. Overall, more than half of these elderly patients (56%) were discharged from the ED to their place of preadmission residence.</p> </sec> <sec id="acem12634-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The current ED evaluation of older adult fallers is discordant with general and ED‐specific fall guidelines. Future studies are warranted to investigate ways to successfully implement fall evaluation guidelines.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Academic emergency medicine. Volume 22:Number 4(2015:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Academic emergency medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 4(2015:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0022-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 461
- Page End:
- 467
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-13
- Subjects:
- Emergency medicine -- Periodicals
616.02505 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15532712 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/acem.12634 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1069-6563
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0570.511250
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3464.xml