Trial heterogeneity and variance models in the genetic evaluation of potato tuber yield. Issue 2 (25th February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paget, Mark F.; Alspach, Peter A.; Anderson, John A.D.; Genet, Russell A.; Apiolaza, Luis A.; Piepho, H.‐P.
• Is Part Of: Plant breeding. Volume 134:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 211
• Publication Date: 2015-02-25
• Subjects: Plant breeding -- Periodicals; 631.52
• DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12251
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0179-9541

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="pbr12251-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Genetic evaluation aims to identify genotypes with high empirical breeding values (EBVs) for selection as parents. In this study, 2157 potato genotypes were evaluated for tuber yield using 8 years of early‐stage trial data collected from a potato breeding programme. Using linear mixed models, spatial parameters to target greater control of localised spatial heterogeneity within trials were estimated and variance models to account for across‐trial genetic heterogeneity were tested. When spatial components improved model fit, correlations of errors were mostly small and negative for marketable tuber yield (MTY) and total tuber yield (TTY), suggesting the presence of interplot competition in some years. For the analysis of multi‐environment trials, a variance model with a simple correlation structure (with heterogeneous variances) was the most favourable variance structure fitted for TTY and PTY (per cent marketable yield). There was very little difference in model fit when comparing a factor analytic structure of order 2 (FA2) with either FA1 or simple correlation structures for MTY, indicating that simple variance models may be preferable for early‐stage genetic evaluation of potato yield.</p> </abstract>