Comparative maxillary bone‐defect healing by calcium‐sulphate or deproteinized bovine bone particles and extra cellular matrix membranes in a guided bone regeneration setting: an experimental study in rabbits. Issue 5 (21st June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative maxillary bone‐defect healing by calcium‐sulphate or deproteinized bovine bone particles and extra cellular matrix membranes in a guided bone regeneration setting: an experimental study in rabbits. Issue 5 (21st June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Comparative maxillary bone‐defect healing by calcium‐sulphate or deproteinized bovine bone particles and extra cellular matrix membranes in a guided bone regeneration setting: an experimental study in rabbits
- Authors:
- Turri, Alberto
Dahlin, Christer - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="clr12425-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The aim of this study was to histologically compare the dynamics of bone healing response between calcium sulphate (CaS) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles in guided bone regeneration utilizing an extracellular matrix membrane (ECM) as barrier.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>Eighteen rabbits were used in thisstudy. 5 × 5 mm defects were created in the edentulous space between the incisors and molars in the maxilla. The CaS and DBBM particles were placed in the defects, with or without the placement of a membrane by means of random selection. Healing was evaluated at 2, 4 and 8 weeks by histology.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total resorption of the CaS material was seen already at 2 weeks. Only minor resorption could be seen of the DBBM particles. The CaS group showed significantly more bone regeneration at all three healing periods compared to the DBBM group. The addition of an ECM membrane demonstrated significant additional effect on bone regeneration. The CaS group showed significant increased amounts of blood vessels compared to the DBBM group.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Thisstudy showed that CaS in combination<abstract abstract-type="main" id="clr12425-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The aim of this study was to histologically compare the dynamics of bone healing response between calcium sulphate (CaS) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles in guided bone regeneration utilizing an extracellular matrix membrane (ECM) as barrier.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>Eighteen rabbits were used in thisstudy. 5 × 5 mm defects were created in the edentulous space between the incisors and molars in the maxilla. The CaS and DBBM particles were placed in the defects, with or without the placement of a membrane by means of random selection. Healing was evaluated at 2, 4 and 8 weeks by histology.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total resorption of the CaS material was seen already at 2 weeks. Only minor resorption could be seen of the DBBM particles. The CaS group showed significantly more bone regeneration at all three healing periods compared to the DBBM group. The addition of an ECM membrane demonstrated significant additional effect on bone regeneration. The CaS group showed significant increased amounts of blood vessels compared to the DBBM group.</p> </sec> <sec id="clr12425-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Thisstudy showed that CaS in combination with an ECM membrane provided synergistic effects on bone regeneration, seemingly due to stimulating angiogenesis in the early healing process.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical oral implants research. Volume 26:Issue 5(2015:May)
- Journal:
- Clinical oral implants research
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 5(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0026-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 501
- Page End:
- 506
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-21
- Subjects:
- Dental implants -- Research -- Periodicals
617.69 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/clr.12425 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0905-7161
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.318000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4326.xml