Comparison of HCF life prediction methods based on different critical planes under multiaxial variable amplitude loading. Issue 4 (12th August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, C.; Shang, D.‐G.; Wang, X.‐W.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.‐Z.
• Is Part Of: Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures. Volume 38:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
• Page Start: 392
• Page End: 401
• Publication Date: 2014-08-12
• Subjects: Materials -- Fatigue -- Periodicals; Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals; 620.1123
• DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12234
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8756-758X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>High‐cycle fatigue life prediction methods based on different critical planes, including the maximum shear stress (MSS) plane, the weighted average shear stress plane and the Maximum Variance shear stress plane, are compared by two multiaxial cycle counting methods, i.e. the main and auxiliary channels (MAC) counting and the relative equivalent stress counting. A modified damage model is used to calculate the multiaxial fatigue damage. Compared with the experimental lives for 7075‐T651 aluminium alloy, the predicted results show that the MSS method together with MAC counting is suitable for the multiaxial fatigue life prediction.</p> </abstract>