The role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care: a study of Demographic and Health Surveys from 46 low‐ and middle‐income countries. Issue 2 (31st October 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care: a study of Demographic and Health Surveys from 46 low‐ and middle‐income countries. Issue 2 (31st October 2014)
- Main Title:
- The role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care: a study of Demographic and Health Surveys from 46 low‐ and middle‐income countries
- Authors:
- Powell‐Jackson, Timothy
Macleod, David
Benova, Lenka
Lynch, Caroline
Campbell, Oona M. R. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="tmi12414-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To examine the role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care (ANC) across low‐ and middle‐income countries.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 46 countries (representing 2.6 billion people) on components of ANC given to 303 908 women aged 15–49 years for most recent birth were used. We identified 79 unique sources of care which were re‐coded into home, public, private (commercial) and private (not‐for‐profit). Use of ANC and a quality of care index (scaled 0–1) were stratified by type of provider, region and wealth quintile. Linear regressions were used to examine the association between provider type and antenatal quality of care score.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Across all countries, the main source of ANC was public (54%), followed by private commercial (36%) and home (5%), but there were large variations by region. Home‐based ANC was associated with worse quality of care (0.2; 95% CI −0.2 to −0.19) relative to the public sector, while the private not‐for‐profit sector (0.03; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.04) was better. There were no differences in quality of care between public and private commercial providers.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0004"<abstract abstract-type="main" id="tmi12414-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To examine the role of the private sector in the provision of antenatal care (ANC) across low‐ and middle‐income countries.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 46 countries (representing 2.6 billion people) on components of ANC given to 303 908 women aged 15–49 years for most recent birth were used. We identified 79 unique sources of care which were re‐coded into home, public, private (commercial) and private (not‐for‐profit). Use of ANC and a quality of care index (scaled 0–1) were stratified by type of provider, region and wealth quintile. Linear regressions were used to examine the association between provider type and antenatal quality of care score.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Across all countries, the main source of ANC was public (54%), followed by private commercial (36%) and home (5%), but there were large variations by region. Home‐based ANC was associated with worse quality of care (0.2; 95% CI −0.2 to −0.19) relative to the public sector, while the private not‐for‐profit sector (0.03; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.04) was better. There were no differences in quality of care between public and private commercial providers.</p> </sec> <sec id="tmi12414-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The market for ANC varies considerably between regions. The two largest sectors – public and private commercial – perform similarly in terms of quality of care. Future research should examine the role of the private sector in other health service domains across multiple countries and test what policies and programmes can encourage private providers to contribute to increased coverage, quality and equity of maternal care.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Tropical medicine & international health. Volume 20:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Tropical medicine & international health
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0020-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 230
- Page End:
- 239
- Publication Date:
- 2014-10-31
- Subjects:
- Tropical medicine -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
616.988 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=tmi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-3156 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/tmi.12414 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1360-2276
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9056.402000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3071.xml