Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Low‐Dose Local Anesthetic: A Prospective, Randomized, Double‐Blind Study. Issue 1 (7th October 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Low‐Dose Local Anesthetic: A Prospective, Randomized, Double‐Blind Study. Issue 1 (7th October 2014)
- Main Title:
- Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Low‐Dose Local Anesthetic: A Prospective, Randomized, Double‐Blind Study
- Authors:
- Woo, Jae Hee
Park, Hahck Soo - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>Intra‐arterial injections of local anesthetic during cervical transforaminal epidural block (TFEB) can cause rare but fatal neurologic complications. We hypothesized that using a dose of local anesthetic lower than seizure threshold during cervical TFEB would not be associated with seizure activity in cases of accidental intra‐arterial injection.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Patients were randomized to one of two groups: group I received injections of 1 mL of 1% lidocaine mixed with dexamethasone 2.5 mg (n = 15), and group II received 1 mL of 0.125% lidocaine mixed with dexamethasone 2.5 mg (n = 15). When the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was greater than 3, cervical TFEBs were performed three times at 2‐week intervals. Patients were evaluated up to 3 months.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Thirty patients with cervical radicular pain were enrolled in this study. The NRS pain score on the day of procedure and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following the initial procedure were similarly significantly reduced in both groups. The total number of procedures performed and the outcomes evaluated according to Odom's criteria at the 3‐month follow‐up visit were not different between groups. Overall, 73.3% and 80% patients in<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>Intra‐arterial injections of local anesthetic during cervical transforaminal epidural block (TFEB) can cause rare but fatal neurologic complications. We hypothesized that using a dose of local anesthetic lower than seizure threshold during cervical TFEB would not be associated with seizure activity in cases of accidental intra‐arterial injection.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Patients were randomized to one of two groups: group I received injections of 1 mL of 1% lidocaine mixed with dexamethasone 2.5 mg (n = 15), and group II received 1 mL of 0.125% lidocaine mixed with dexamethasone 2.5 mg (n = 15). When the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was greater than 3, cervical TFEBs were performed three times at 2‐week intervals. Patients were evaluated up to 3 months.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Thirty patients with cervical radicular pain were enrolled in this study. The NRS pain score on the day of procedure and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following the initial procedure were similarly significantly reduced in both groups. The total number of procedures performed and the outcomes evaluated according to Odom's criteria at the 3‐month follow‐up visit were not different between groups. Overall, 73.3% and 80% patients in groups I and II, respectively, rated the degree of their symptom relief as excellent or good.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12582-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Cervical TFEB performed using 0.125% lidocaine with dexamethasone achieved similar satisfactory effects as 1% lidocaine with dexamethasone for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. Therefore, the use of low‐dose lidocaine with dexamethasone is reasonable for cervical TFEB, as this may reduce the incidence of rare but fatal complications.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain medicine. Volume 16:Issue 1(2015)
- Journal:
- Pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 1(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0016-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 61
- Page End:
- 67
- Publication Date:
- 2014-10-07
- Subjects:
- Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesics -- Periodicals
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain Management -- Periodicals
Douleur -- Périodiques
Douleur -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Analgésiques -- Périodiques
Analgésique
Soulagement de la douleur
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1526-2375;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1526-4637 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=pme ↗
http://painmedicine.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/pme.12582 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1526-2375
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.806000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3050.xml