Ants in their plants: Pseudomyrmex ants reduce primate, parrot and squirrel predation on Macrolobium acaciifolium (Fabaceae) seeds in Amazonian Brazil. (30th December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barnett, Adrian A.; Almeida, Thais; Andrade, Richelly; Boyle, Sarah; de Lima, Marcelo Gonçalves; MacLarnon, Ann; Ross, Caroline; Silva, Welma Sousa; Spironello, Wilson R.; Ronchi‐Teles, Beatriz
• Is Part Of: Biological journal of the Linnean Society. Volume 114:Number 2(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 260
• Page End: 273
• Publication Date: 2014-12-30
• Subjects: Biology -- Periodicals; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; 570
• DOI: 10.1111/bij.12425
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0024-4066

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Although plant‐inhabiting ants are known to act as effective deterrents to a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores, this has been reported only once before for primates, a group better known for their predation of ants. In the present study, we investigated the effects that colonies of <italic>Pseudomyrmex viduus</italic> ants living in individual <italic>Macrolobium acaciifolium</italic> (Fabaceae) trees have on the rates of visitation and fruit removal by four taxa of seed‐predating vertebrates: the primate <italic>Cacajao melanocephalus ouakary</italic>; macaws (<italic>Ara</italic> spp.); large parrots (<italic>Amazona</italic> spp.); and the Northern Amazonian red squirrel (<italic>Sciurus igniventris</italic>). We found that ant presence significantly reduced both rates of visitation and of fruit removal by <italic>C. m. ouakary</italic>. The same pattern of reduced fruit removal was also observed for other seed predators (parrots, macaws, and squirrels) but not for visitation rates (although this may be a result of the small sample size). This appears to be only the second‐known demonstration of the repellent effect of ants on primates and, indeed, the first for squirrels and psittacine birds. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, <italic>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</italic>, 2015, <bold>114</bold>, 260–273.</p> </abstract>