Next‐generation sequencing sheds light on the natural history of hepatitis C infection in patients who fail treatment. Issue 1 (30th July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdelrahman, Tamer; Hughes, Joseph; Main, Janice; McLauchlan, John; Thursz, Mark; Thomson, Emma
• Is Part Of: Hepatology. Volume 61:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 88
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2014-07-30
• Subjects: Heart -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Lungs -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Intensive care nursing -- Periodicals; Foie -- Maladies -- Périodiques; 616.362
• DOI: 10.1002/hep.27192
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0270-9139

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>High rates of sexually transmitted infection and reinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have recently been reported in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected men who have sex with men and reinfection has also been described in monoinfected injecting drug users. The diagnosis of reinfection has traditionally been based on direct Sanger sequencing of samples pre‐ and posttreatment, but not on more sensitive deep sequencing techniques. We studied viral quasispecies dynamics in patients who failed standard of care therapy in a high‐risk HIV‐infected cohort of patients with early HCV infection to determine whether treatment failure was associated with reinfection or recrudescence of preexisting infection. Paired sequences (pre‐ and posttreatment) were analyzed. The HCV E2 hypervariable region‐1 was amplified using nested reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) with indexed genotype‐specific primers and the same products were sequenced using both Sanger and 454 pyrosequencing approaches. Of 99 HIV‐infected patients with acute HCV treated with 24‐48 weeks of pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin, 15 failed to achieve a sustained virological response (six relapsed, six had a null response, and three had a partial response). Using direct sequencing, 10/15 patients (66%) had evidence of a previously undetected strain posttreatment; in many studies, this is interpreted as reinfection. However, pyrosequencing revealed that 15/15 (100%) of patients had evidence of persisting infection; 6/15 (40%) patients had evidence of a previously undetected variant present in the posttreatment sample in addition to a variant that was detected at baseline. This could represent superinfection or a limitation of the sensitivity of pyrosequencing. <italic>Conclusion</italic>: In this high‐risk group, the emergence of new viral strains following treatment failure is most commonly associated with emerging dominance of preexisting minority variants rather than reinfection. Superinfection may occur in this cohort but reinfection is overestimated by Sanger sequencing. (H<sc>epatology</sc> 2015;61:88–97)</p> </abstract>