Negative Agenda Control and the Conservative Coalition in the U.S. House. (28th July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jenkins, Jeffery A.; Monroe, Nathan W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of politics. Volume 76:Number 4(2014:Oct.)
• Page Start: 1116
• Page End: 1127
• Publication Date: 2014-07-28
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022381614000620
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3816

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <italic>While it is widely believed that a "conservative coalition" of Southern Democrats and Republicans sometimes formed on floor votes in the mid-twentieth-century House to block liberal policy initiatives, a fully fleshed-out picture of what the coalition was and how it operated is lacking. In this article, we investigate whether the conservative coalition wielded negative agenda control, that is, whether it used positions of power in the House to block bills from floor consideration that would have harmed a majority of its members. We find that the likelihood that the conservative coalition was rolled increased significantly after the Rules Committee packing in 1961—especially for bills that came from standing committees chaired by nonsoutherners. These results are consistent with the notion that Rules systematically protected the conservative coalition from unfavorable floor votes and that southern committee chairs continued to offer some blocking power after the Rules packing.</italic> </p> </abstract>