USPIO‐related T1 and T2 mapping MRI of cartilage in a rabbit model of blood‐induced arthritis: a pilot study. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Amirabadi, A.; Vidarsson, L.; Miller, E.; Sussman, M. S.; Patil, K.; Gahunia, H.; Peel, S. A. F.; Zhong, A.; Weiss, R.; Detzler, G.; Cheng, H. L. M.; Moineddin, R.; Doria, A. S.
• Is Part Of: Haemophilia. Volume 21:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: e59
• Page End: e69
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: Hemophilia -- Periodicals; 616.1572005
• DOI: 10.1111/hae.12601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-8216

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="hae12601-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>Ultrasmall paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)‐enhanced MRI is promising for evaluating inflammation. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of USPIO on cartilage T1 and T2 mapping, and to evaluate a proposed rapid vs. conventional T2 map method for imaging cartilage in a blood‐induced arthritis model. Knees of nine arthritic (induction by intra‐articular autologous blood injection) and six control rabbits were imaged over time (baseline, weeks 1, 5, 10) by 1.5T MRI. All rabbits had USPIO (35–75 μmol Fe/kg)‐enhanced MRI at each time point. T1 and T2 (conventional and rapid) maps and signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNR) were obtained pre‐ and post‐USPIO administration. Cartilage biochemistry and histology were compared with MRI. Excellent correlations were noted between T1 map values and histologic scores at week 10 pre‐USPIO (medial, <italic>r = </italic>0.93<italic>, P = </italic>0.0007; lateral, <italic>r = </italic>0.87<italic>, P = </italic>0.005) in the arthritic group, but not between T2 map and histology. Marginally and significant differences were observed between pre‐ and post‐USPIO T2 values at weeks 5 (<italic>P = </italic>0.06<italic>)</italic> and 10 <italic>(P = </italic>0.02<italic>)</italic>, but only with the administration of high USPIO doses in the arthritic group using the conventional method. No significant differences were noted between pre‐ and post‐USPIO T1 values at any imaging time points. Cartilage T2 maps with short‐TR and conventional protocols provided similar T2 values [(decreased trend)] (<italic>P </italic>><italic> </italic>0.05). Concomitant use of USPIO to T1 and T2 mapping of cartilage would not impair the identification of interval changes of T1 and T2 maps. Rapid T2 map provides similar results compared to conventional method, but its validation warrants further investigation.</p> </abstract>