Broader health coverage is good for the nation's health: evidence from country level panel data. (19th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moreno‐Serra, Rodrigo; Smith, Peter C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Volume 178:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 101
• Page End: 124
• Publication Date: 2014-02-19
• Subjects: Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Statistics -- Periodicals; 300.15195
• DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0964-1998

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="rssa12048-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>Progress towards universal health coverage involves providing people with access to needed health services without entailing financial hardship and is often advocated on the grounds that it improves population health. The paper offers econometric evidence on the effects of health coverage on mortality outcomes at the national level. We use a large panel data set of countries, examined by using instrumental variable specifications that explicitly allow for potential reverse causality and unobserved country‐specific characteristics. We employ various proxies for the coverage level in a health system. Our results indicate that expanded health coverage, particularly through higher levels of publicly funded health spending, results in lower child and adult mortality, with the beneficial effect on child mortality being larger in poorer countries.</p> </abstract>