Challenges with effective nutrient supplementation for amphibians: A review of cricket studies. Issue 6 (1st October 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Livingston, Shannon; Lavin, Shana R.; Sullivan, Kathleen; Attard, Lydia; Valdes, Eduardo V.
• Is Part Of: Zoo biology. Volume 33:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 565
• Page End: 576
• Publication Date: 2014-10-01
• Subjects: Zoo animals -- Periodicals; 591
• DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21177
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0733-3188

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="zoo21177-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Over the last 25 years, numerous studies have investigated the impact of insect supplementation on insect nutrient content. In light of recent nutrition related challenges with regards to zoo amphibians fed an insect based diet, this review attempts to comprehensively compile both anecdotal and published data in the context of practical application on this topic. Insects, primarily crickets, used for amphibian diets historically demonstrate low concentrations of key nutrients including calcium and vitamin A. Commonly used practices for supplementation involving powder dusting or gut loading have been shown to improve delivery of calcium and vitamin A, though often not reaching desired nutrient concentrations. The large variety of factors influencing insect nutrient content are difficult to control, making study design, and results often inconsistent. Formulation and availability of more effective gut loading diets, combined with a standardized protocol for insect husbandry and dietary management may be the most effective way to supplement insects for use in amphibian feeding programs. Ideally, the nutritional improvement of feeder insects would begin at the breeder level; however, until this becomes a viable choice, we confirm that supplementation of crickets through both gut‐loading and dusting appear necessary to support the nutritional health of amphibians and other insectivores in managed collections. Zoo Biol. 33:565–576, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>