Limitations of predicting in vivo biostability of multiphase polyurethane elastomers using temperature‐accelerated degradation testing. Issue 1 (8th May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Limitations of predicting in vivo biostability of multiphase polyurethane elastomers using temperature‐accelerated degradation testing. Issue 1 (8th May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Limitations of predicting in vivo biostability of multiphase polyurethane elastomers using temperature‐accelerated degradation testing
- Authors:
- Padsalgikar, Ajay
Cosgriff‐Hernandez, Elizabeth
Gallagher, Genevieve
Touchet, Tyler
Iacob, Ciprian
Mellin, Lisa
Norlin‐Weissenrieder, Anna
Runt, James - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Polyurethane biostability has been the subject of intense research since the failure of polyether polyurethane pacemaker leads in the 1980s. Accelerated <italic>in vitro</italic> testing has been used to isolate degradation mechanisms and predict clinical performance of biomaterials. However, validation that <italic>in vitro</italic> methods reproduce <italic>in vivo</italic> degradation is critical to the selection of appropriate tests. High temperature has been proposed as a method to accelerate degradation. However, correlation of such data to <italic>in vivo</italic> performance is poor for polyurethanes due to the impact of temperature on microstructure. In this study, we characterize the lack of correlation between hydrolytic degradation predicted using a high temperature aging model of a polydimethylsiloxane‐based polyurethane and its <italic>in vivo</italic> performance. Most notably, the predicted molecular weight and tensile property changes from the accelerated aging study did not correlate with clinical explants subjected to human biological stresses in real time through 5 years. Further, DMTA, ATR‐FTIR, and SAXS experiments on samples aged for 2 weeks in PBS indicated greater phase separation in samples aged at 85°C compared to those aged at 37°C and unaged controls. These results confirm that microstructural changes occur at high temperatures that do not occur at <italic>in vivo</italic> temperatures.<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Polyurethane biostability has been the subject of intense research since the failure of polyether polyurethane pacemaker leads in the 1980s. Accelerated <italic>in vitro</italic> testing has been used to isolate degradation mechanisms and predict clinical performance of biomaterials. However, validation that <italic>in vitro</italic> methods reproduce <italic>in vivo</italic> degradation is critical to the selection of appropriate tests. High temperature has been proposed as a method to accelerate degradation. However, correlation of such data to <italic>in vivo</italic> performance is poor for polyurethanes due to the impact of temperature on microstructure. In this study, we characterize the lack of correlation between hydrolytic degradation predicted using a high temperature aging model of a polydimethylsiloxane‐based polyurethane and its <italic>in vivo</italic> performance. Most notably, the predicted molecular weight and tensile property changes from the accelerated aging study did not correlate with clinical explants subjected to human biological stresses in real time through 5 years. Further, DMTA, ATR‐FTIR, and SAXS experiments on samples aged for 2 weeks in PBS indicated greater phase separation in samples aged at 85°C compared to those aged at 37°C and unaged controls. These results confirm that microstructural changes occur at high temperatures that do not occur at <italic>in vivo</italic> temperatures. In addition, water absorption studies demonstrated that water saturation levels increased significantly with temperature. This study highlights that the multiphase morphology of polyurethane precludes the use of temperature accelerated biodegradation for the prediction of clinical performance and provides critical information in designing appropriate <italic>in vitro</italic> tests for this class of materials. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 159–168, 2015.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomedical materials research. Volume 103:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomedical materials research
- Issue:
- Volume 103:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 103, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 103
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0103-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 159
- Page End:
- 168
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05-08
- Subjects:
- Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/jbm.b.33161 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1552-4973
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4953.725000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3454.xml