A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure—1-year outcome. (November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure—1-year outcome. (November 2014)
- Main Title:
- A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure—1-year outcome
- Authors:
- Aspinen, Samuli
Harju, Jukka
Juvonen, Petri
Kokki, Hannu
Remes, Veikko
Scheinin, Tom
Eskelinen, Matti - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold> <italic>Objective.</italic> </bold> The long-term outcome between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has not been compared in randomized trials. Therefore, we investigated the outcome after conventional LC and MC with UsD in 78 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0172340). <bold><italic>Material and methods.</italic></bold> Initially 88 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (<italic>n</italic> = 44) or LC (<italic>n</italic> = 44) over a period of 2 years (2010–2012) and 78 of them (89%) were reached for a follow-up interview at 12 months after the surgery. <bold><italic>Results.</italic></bold> Baseline parameters were similar in the two groups, and 1/44 MCs and 2/44 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) one year after the procedure was quite similar in the two groups: 3/36 (8%) in the MC group and 2/42 (5%) in the LC group (<italic>p</italic> = 0.502). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but the proportion was similar in both groups (28% in MC and 33% in LC group, <italic>p</italic> = 0.665). Both groups were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (numeric rating scale, <italic>p</italic> = 0.470). The Quality of life (QoL) improved 34/36 (94%) in the MC group and 33/42 (79%) in the LC group (<italic>p</italic> = 0.046) and all<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold> <italic>Objective.</italic> </bold> The long-term outcome between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has not been compared in randomized trials. Therefore, we investigated the outcome after conventional LC and MC with UsD in 78 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0172340). <bold><italic>Material and methods.</italic></bold> Initially 88 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (<italic>n</italic> = 44) or LC (<italic>n</italic> = 44) over a period of 2 years (2010–2012) and 78 of them (89%) were reached for a follow-up interview at 12 months after the surgery. <bold><italic>Results.</italic></bold> Baseline parameters were similar in the two groups, and 1/44 MCs and 2/44 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) one year after the procedure was quite similar in the two groups: 3/36 (8%) in the MC group and 2/42 (5%) in the LC group (<italic>p</italic> = 0.502). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but the proportion was similar in both groups (28% in MC and 33% in LC group, <italic>p</italic> = 0.665). Both groups were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (numeric rating scale, <italic>p</italic> = 0.470). The Quality of life (QoL) improved 34/36 (94%) in the MC group and 33/42 (79%) in the LC group (<italic>p</italic> = 0.046) and all patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation overall. <bold><italic>Conclusion.</italic></bold> Day-case MC and LC patients have a quite similar one-year outcome with no significant difference regarding residual abdominal symptoms, cosmetic satisfaction, QoL or CPSP.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Volume 49:Number 11(2014)
- Journal:
- Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Number 11(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 11 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0049-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1336
- Page End:
- 1342
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/gas ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/00365521.2014.958095 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0036-5521
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8087.507000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3941.xml