Influence of post‐annealing ambient gas on photoluminescence characteristics for ion beam synthesized Ge nanoparticles in SiO2 and Si3N4 films. (15th May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, C. F.; Chao, D. S.; Tsai, H. S.; Liang, J. H.; Yurimoto, Hisayoshi
• Is Part Of: Surface and interface analysis. Volume 46:Number 12/13(2014)
• Page Start: 1160
• Page End: 1164
• Publication Date: 2014-05-15
• Subjects: Surfaces (Physics) -- Periodicals; Surface chemistry -- Periodicals; Thin films -- Periodicals; 541.33
• DOI: 10.1002/sia.5563
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-2421

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Ion beam synthesized Ge nanoparticles in SiO<sub>2</sub> film have received intense interest due to their distinctive optical features. Nevertheless, the fundamental mechanism behind luminescence from Ge nanoparticles still remains under debate. In order to investigate the influence of oxygen content on the optical properties of Ge nanoparticles, post‐annealing treatments under various annealing atmospheres including vacuum, air, and N<sub>2</sub> were conducted to synthesize Ge nanoparticles. An oxygen‐free Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> matrix material was also adopted to compare with the results of SiO<sub>2</sub> one. The results revealed that photoluminescence (PL) around 3.1 eV can be emitted from Ge‐implanted SiO<sub>2</sub> films. However, Ge‐implanted SiO<sub>2</sub> films appear remarkably diverse PL characteristics when annealed in different ambient gases. PL intensity fluctuates with temperature in the specimens annealed under vacuum and air due to the GeO<sub>x</sub> formation and dissolution. Otherwise, the N<sub>2</sub>‐annealed specimens can suppress germanium oxidation process, thus allowing for an entirely different evolution of PL intensity with temperature. In contrast to the SiO<sub>2</sub> matrix, no PL emission can be found for the Ge nanoparticles formed in the Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> films, again proving that the 3.1‐eV emission band indeed originates from the oxygen‐deficient centers at the interface between SiO<sub>2</sub> matrix and Ge or GeO<sub>x</sub> nanoparticles. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>