Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy. (5th July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy. (5th July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy
- Authors:
- Kang, Xin
Cos, Teresa
Guizani, Meriem
Cannie, Mieke M.
Segers, Valérie
Jani, Jacques C. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine parental acceptance of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) involving postmortem imaging and organ tissue sampling compared with conventional autopsy and to compare the acceptability of percutaneous versus laparoscopic‐guided biopsy.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Following termination of pregnancy parents were offered the option of traditional autopsy and subsequently interviewed about their acceptance of MIA. The McNemar test for paired samples was used to assess the difference in acceptance of MIA and conventional autopsy. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test for paired samples was used to compare the acceptance score for percutaneous versus laparoscopic‐guided biopsy. Logistic regression was selected to study the association of parental acceptance of conventional autopsy and MIA with different variables.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Conventional autopsy was accepted by 42 (60.0%) of the 70 parents. Regression analysis showed that non‐Muslim faith was the only factor significantly associated with acceptance of conventional autopsy (<italic>p</italic> = 0.030). Of 28 parents who initially refused conventional autopsy, 13(46.4%) subsequently accepted MIA, increasing acceptance to 78.6% (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Regression analysis<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine parental acceptance of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) involving postmortem imaging and organ tissue sampling compared with conventional autopsy and to compare the acceptability of percutaneous versus laparoscopic‐guided biopsy.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Following termination of pregnancy parents were offered the option of traditional autopsy and subsequently interviewed about their acceptance of MIA. The McNemar test for paired samples was used to assess the difference in acceptance of MIA and conventional autopsy. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test for paired samples was used to compare the acceptance score for percutaneous versus laparoscopic‐guided biopsy. Logistic regression was selected to study the association of parental acceptance of conventional autopsy and MIA with different variables.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Conventional autopsy was accepted by 42 (60.0%) of the 70 parents. Regression analysis showed that non‐Muslim faith was the only factor significantly associated with acceptance of conventional autopsy (<italic>p</italic> = 0.030). Of 28 parents who initially refused conventional autopsy, 13(46.4%) subsequently accepted MIA, increasing acceptance to 78.6% (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Regression analysis showed that none of the factors significantly affected MIA acceptance. Parents expressed no preference between postmortem percutaneous versus laparoscopic‐guided biopsy (<italic>p</italic> = 0.061).</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4435-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Post‐mortem imaging combined with systematic organ biopsies is highly acceptable among all parents independent of their religion and the method used for organ biopsy. © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 34:Number 11(2014:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 11(2014:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 11 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0034-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1106
- Page End:
- 1110
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-05
- Subjects:
- Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.32075 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pd.4435 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0197-3851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6607.646000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3282.xml