Assessment of the Clavien‐Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery. (27th September 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of the Clavien‐Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery. (27th September 2014)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of the Clavien‐Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery
- Authors:
- Monteiro, Eric
Sklar, Michael C.
Eskander, Antoine
de Almeida, John R.
Shrime, Mark
Gullane, Patrick
Irish, Jonathan
Gilbert, Ralph
Brown, Dale
Higgins, Kevin
Enepekides, Danny
Goldstein, David P. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives/Hypothesis</title> <p>The importance of reporting and grading surgical complications is central to quality improvement in head and neck surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the interobserver reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the Clavien‐Dindo classification system for use in grading complications related to head and neck surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design</title> <p>1 and 2.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Hypothetical cases of common head and neck surgical complications, along with a brief questionnaire, were responded to by 81 residents, fellows, and head and neck surgeons for grading to assess the interobserver reliability of the Clavien‐Dindo system. Construct validity was assessed with the a priori hypothesis that increasing complication grade resulted in an increased length of hospital stay.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Interobserver reliability scores for the complication grading scenarios ranged mostly from moderate to high. The grading system was well received by the respondents, but specific concerns were raised regarding utility in head and neck surgery. Construct validity was confirmed as hospital length of stay was<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives/Hypothesis</title> <p>The importance of reporting and grading surgical complications is central to quality improvement in head and neck surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the interobserver reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the Clavien‐Dindo classification system for use in grading complications related to head and neck surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design</title> <p>1 and 2.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Hypothetical cases of common head and neck surgical complications, along with a brief questionnaire, were responded to by 81 residents, fellows, and head and neck surgeons for grading to assess the interobserver reliability of the Clavien‐Dindo system. Construct validity was assessed with the a priori hypothesis that increasing complication grade resulted in an increased length of hospital stay.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Interobserver reliability scores for the complication grading scenarios ranged mostly from moderate to high. The grading system was well received by the respondents, but specific concerns were raised regarding utility in head and neck surgery. Construct validity was confirmed as hospital length of stay was statistically related to complication grade (<italic>P</italic> = .002)</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Reporting of complications is critical to quality improvement in surgical practice. Currently, the Clavien‐Dindo complication grading scale system is a useful tool for grading head and neck surgery complications; however, the development of a grading scale customized to head and neck surgery may be beneficial in the future.</p> </sec> <sec id="lary24817-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Level of Evidence</title> <p>N/A. <italic>Laryngoscope</italic>, 124:2726–2731, 2014</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Laryngoscope. Volume 124:Number 12(2014:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Laryngoscope
- Issue:
- Volume 124:Number 12(2014:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 124, Issue 12 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0124-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 2726
- Page End:
- 2731
- Publication Date:
- 2014-09-27
- Subjects:
- Otolaryngology -- Periodicals
617.51005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1531-4995/issues ↗
http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0023-852X ↗
http://www.laryngoscope.com ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/lary.24817 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0023-852X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5156.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3783.xml