Reproducibility of the quantification of arterial and tissue contributions in multiple postlabeling delay arterial spin labeling. Issue 6 (13th November 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sousa, Inês; Vilela, Pedro; Figueiredo, Patrícia
• Is Part Of: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 40:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 1453
• Page End: 1462
• Publication Date: 2013-11-13
• Subjects: Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24493
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-1807

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jmri24493-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>To evaluate the reproducibility of estimation of cerebral blood flow (CBF), bolus arrival time (BAT), and arterial blood volume (aBV) from arterial spin labeling (ASL) data acquired at multiple postlabeling delays (PLDs).</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24493-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>CBF, BAT, and aBV parameters were estimated from flow‐suppressed and nonflow‐suppressed multiple‐PDL PICORE‐Q2TIPS ASL using model‐based Bayesian and least‐squares fitting frameworks, and aBV was also obtained from a model‐free approach. Reproducibility of these parameters was assessed by computing the within‐ and between‐subject coefficients of variability (CVw and CVb).</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24493-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>CVw and CVb were comparable across model‐based approaches, but were greater for the aBV from the model‐free approach. Overall, the Bayesian model estimation procedure was found to provide the best compromise between reliability and reproducibility, yielding CVw/CVb values of 21/21, 3/4, and 24/26% for CBF, BAT, and aBV, respectively. Although a CBF range of 45 mL/100g/min to 59 mL/100g/min was found on average and a BAT of 0.7–1.0 seconds across methods, the corresponding maps were comparable in terms of the parameters' spatial distributions, and in particular in the identification of macrovascular locations, as assessed through comparison with time‐of‐flight images.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24493-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Reproducible estimates of CBF, BAT, and aBV values can be obtained from non‐macroflow‐suppressed ASL using both least‐squares and Bayesian model‐based methods. <bold>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:1453–1462</bold>. © <bold>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</bold>.</p> </sec> </abstract>