Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine‐ and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: A systematic review and analysis. Issue 11 (3rd April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schmidt, Robert L.; Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta D.; Allred, Rebecca J.; Matsuoka, Shotaro; Witt, Benjamin L.; Eisele, David W.
• Is Part Of: Head & neck. Volume 36:Issue 11(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1654
• Page End: 1661
• Publication Date: 2014-04-03
• Subjects: Head -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neck -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Head -- Periodicals; Neck -- Periodicals; Face -- Periodicals; 617.51059
• DOI: 10.1002/hed.23495
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1043-3074

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="hed23495-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies for needle biopsy are frequently published in otolaryngology journals, but this body of literature has not been assessed for verification bias.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23495-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We conducted a systematic review of DTA studies on needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions appearing in otolaryngology journals. Studies were assessed by 2 reviewers for verification bias.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23495-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>We identified 95 DTA studies for needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions. Eighty‐one studies (84%) had verification bias. Five of the biased studies provided sufficient data to estimate the extent of bias. Verification bias was associated with an overestimate of sensitivity and an underestimate of specificity. Studies on core needle biopsy (CNB) had a lower rate of verification bias than fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) studies.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23495-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Verification bias is common in DTA studies of needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions published in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) journals. Such studies overestimated sensitivity and underestimated specificity. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. <italic>Head Neck</italic> 36: 1654–1661, 2014</p> </sec> </abstract>