Evaluation of the use and handling of three different pen systems considered for in vitro fertilization treatment. (December 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of the use and handling of three different pen systems considered for in vitro fertilization treatment. (December 2014)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of the use and handling of three different pen systems considered for in vitro fertilization treatment
- Authors:
- Imthurn, Bruno
McVeigh, Enda
Stiller, Ruth
Arnold, Michelle
Pringle, Fiona
Irps, Charlotte
Rettenbacher, Manfred - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold> <italic>Objective:</italic> </bold> The objective of this study was to assess and compare the features of the Bemfola, Gonal-f and Puregon injection pens.</p> <p> <bold> <italic>Methods:</italic> </bold> Females who intended to undergo hormonal treatment received the three different pens in a randomized, consecutive sequence. For each of the pens, the potential patients completed an Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire, as well as a questionnaire comparing the handling, convenience and preference among the three pens.</p> <p> <bold> <italic>Results:</italic> </bold> The mean score on the visual analogue scale (VAS) for the Bemfola pen (BP) was 77.8 ± 14.0; for the Puregon pen (PP), 72.1 ± 12.4; and for the Gonal-f pen (GP), 68.6 ± 16.4. The BP was superior to both competitor devices in pen size, inconspicuousness, ease of use and dose changing; no significant differences to both competitor pens were observed in the way the pen looks, the way the pen feels and the ease of injection of the volume. The 'overall' assessment was significantly better for the BP when compared to the GP (p = 0.0019), while no significant difference was observed between the BP and the PP.</p> <p> <bold> <italic>Conclusions:</italic> </bold> This study demonstrated significantly higher ratings for pen size, inconspicuousness, ease of use and dose adjustment for the BP compared to other marketed pens.</p> </abstract>
- Is Part Of:
- Expert opinion on drug delivery. Volume 11:Number 12(2014:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Expert opinion on drug delivery
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Number 12(2014:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 12 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0011-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1859
- Page End:
- 1864
- Publication Date:
- 2014-12
- Subjects:
- Drug delivery devices -- Periodicals
Drug delivery systems -- Periodicals
615.605 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/journal/edd ↗
http://www.ashley-pub.com/?cookieSet=1 ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1517/17425247.2014.965676 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1742-5247
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3842.002941
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4365.xml