A 'Galilean' science of language1. Issue 3 (November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: BEHME, CHRISTINA
• Is Part Of: Journal of linguistics. Volume 50:Issue 3(2014)
• Page Start: 671
• Page End: 704
• Publication Date: 2014-11
• Subjects: Linguistics -- Periodicals; 410.5
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022226714000061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2267

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <italic>The Science of Language</italic>, published in the sixth decade of Noam Chomsky's linguistic career, defends views that are visibly out of touch with recent research in formal linguistics, developmental child psychology, computational modeling of language acquisition, and language evolution. I argue that the poor quality of this volume is representative of the serious shortcomings of Chomsky's recent scholarship, especially of his criticism of and contribution to debates about language evolution. Chomsky creates the impression that he is quoting titbits of a massive body of scientific work he has conducted or is intimately familiar with. Yet his speculations reveal a lack of even basic understanding of biology, and an unwillingness to engage seriously with the relevant literature. At the same time, he ridicules the work of virtually all other theorists, without spelling out the views he disagrees with. A critical analysis of the 'Galilean method' demonstrates that Chomsky uses appeal to authority to insulate his own proposals against falsification by empirical counter-evidence. This form of discourse bears no serious relation to the way science proceeds.</p> </abstract>