SHADOW PLAYS, SHIFTING SANDS AND INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW: CONVERGENCES IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC. Issue 2 (6th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crock, Mary
• Is Part Of: International and comparative law quarterly. Volume 63:Issue 2(2014)
• Page Start: 247
• Page End: 280
• Publication Date: 2014-03-06
• Subjects: International law -- Periodicals; Comparative law -- Periodicals; 340.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S0020589314000050
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-5893

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>While many Australians continue to see their roots in Western Europe, in matters concerning human rights and immigration control, Australia's culture and attitudes over time have become more closely aligned with those of States in its immediate geographical region. The trend finds obvious expression in the convergence of laws and policies governing the treatment of asylum seekers. This article uses as a case study various efforts made to establish regional frameworks for the management of irregular (forced) migration. The author argues that Australia's reversion to deflection and offshore processing as deterrent measures resonates with the discourse in two States that have been closely associated with the new 'arrangements': Malaysia and Indonesia. Australia's policies make express reference to laws and State behaviour in the region through what has been labelled the 'no advantage' principle governing Australia's treatment of asylum seekers presenting as unauthorized maritime arrivals (UMAs). The central idea is that these asylum seekers should gain no material advantage by reaching Australia in comparison with the situation they would face if their claims were processed in States of first refuge. If the comparators are the refugee-receiving States around Australia, the policy has to play out in the degradation of terms and conditions faced by UMAs in Australia. In the area of human rights and refugee policy, the author argues that Australia should be doing more to distinguish itself as a leader rather than follow the (generally poor) practices of its neighbours.</p> </abstract>