Culture, Paradigm, and Communication Theory: A Matter of Boundary or Commensurability?. Issue 4 (November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Georgette
• Is Part Of: Communication theory. Volume 24:Issue 4(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 373
• Page End: 393
• Publication Date: 2014-11
• Subjects: Communication -- Periodicals; Information theory -- Periodicals; 302.205
• DOI: 10.1111/comt.12045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-3293

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="comt12045-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p id="comt12045-para-0001">The discussion on geocultural theory has underscored the urgency for us to re‐examine the way cultural differences are handled in academic discourse. Boundaries need to be drawn, because European universality neglects cultural and also paradigm differences. This article argues that as locking universality and particularity in a dualist paradigm is part of the problem, drawing boundaries to concepts and theories will lead to further problems. Borrowing from the Chinese yin/yang dynamic worldview and the Kuhnian notion of incommensurability, the author proposes a methodological framework in which commensurability, rather than universality, is the major concern. The commensurability model and the universality model are compared with examples to illustrate how the former may help advance theory development from a local perspective.</p> </abstract>