Quantifying the defensive medicine contribution to primary care costs. (November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Quantifying the defensive medicine contribution to primary care costs. (November 2014)
- Main Title:
- Quantifying the defensive medicine contribution to primary care costs
- Authors:
- Brateanu, Andrei
Schramm, Sarah
Hu, Bo
Boyer, Kristen
Nottingham, Kelly
Taksler, Glen B.
Jolly, Stacey
Goodman, Kenneth
Misra-Hebert, Anita
Vakharia, Nirav
Hamilton, Aaron C.
Bales, Robert
Manne, Mahesh
Lathia, Amanda
Deshpande, Abhishek
Rothberg, Michael B. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ss1"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Defensive medicine represents one cause of economic losses in healthcare. Studies that measured its cost have produced conflicting results.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss2"> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To directly measure the proportion of primary care costs attributable to defensive medicine.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss3"> <title>Research design and methods:</title> <p>Six-week prospective study of primary care physicians from four outpatient practices. On 3 distinct days, participants were asked to rate each order placed the day before on the extent to which it represented defensive medicine, using a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all defensive) to 4 (entirely defensive).</p> </sec> <sec id="ss4"> <title>Main outcome measures:</title> <p>This study calculated the order defensiveness score for each order (the defensiveness/4) and the physician defensive score (the mean of all orders defensiveness scores). Each order was assigned a weighted cost by multiplying the total cost of that order (based on Medicare reimbursement rates) by the order defensiveness score. The proportion of total cost attributable to defensive medicine was calculated by dividing the weighted cost of defensive orders by the total cost of all orders.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss5"> <title>Results:</title> <p>Of 50 eligible physicians, 23 agreed to participate; 21 returned the surveys and rated 1234 individual orders on 347 patients. Physicians<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ss1"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Defensive medicine represents one cause of economic losses in healthcare. Studies that measured its cost have produced conflicting results.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss2"> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To directly measure the proportion of primary care costs attributable to defensive medicine.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss3"> <title>Research design and methods:</title> <p>Six-week prospective study of primary care physicians from four outpatient practices. On 3 distinct days, participants were asked to rate each order placed the day before on the extent to which it represented defensive medicine, using a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all defensive) to 4 (entirely defensive).</p> </sec> <sec id="ss4"> <title>Main outcome measures:</title> <p>This study calculated the order defensiveness score for each order (the defensiveness/4) and the physician defensive score (the mean of all orders defensiveness scores). Each order was assigned a weighted cost by multiplying the total cost of that order (based on Medicare reimbursement rates) by the order defensiveness score. The proportion of total cost attributable to defensive medicine was calculated by dividing the weighted cost of defensive orders by the total cost of all orders.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss5"> <title>Results:</title> <p>Of 50 eligible physicians, 23 agreed to participate; 21 returned the surveys and rated 1234 individual orders on 347 patients. Physicians wrote an average of 3.6 ± 1.0 orders/visit with an associated total cost of $72.60 ± 18.5 per order. Across physicians, the median physician defensive score was 0.018 (IQR = [0.008, 0.049]) and the proportion of costs attributable to defensive medicine was 3.1% (IQR = [0.5%, 7.2%]). Physicians with defensive scores above vs below the median had a similar number of orders and total costs per visit. Physicians were more likely to place defensive orders if trained in community hospitals vs academic centers (OR = 4.29; 95% CI = 1.55–11.86; <italic>p</italic> = 0.01).</p> </sec> <sec id="ss6"> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>This study describes a new method to directly quantify the cost of defensive medicine. Defensive medicine appears to have minimal impact on primary care costs.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical economics. Volume 17:Number 11(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical economics
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Number 11(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 11 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0017-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 810
- Page End:
- 816
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11
- Subjects:
- Medical care -- Cost control -- Periodicals
Medical economics -- Periodicals
362.10941 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/jme ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3111/13696998.2014.959125 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1369-6998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5017.049500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4347.xml