Outcomes of shipped live donor kidney transplants compared with traditional living donor kidney transplants. (22nd September 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Treat, Eric G.; Miller, Eric T.; Kwan, Lorna; Connor, Sarah E.; Maliski, Sally L.; Hicks, Elisabeth M.; Williams, Kristen C.; Whitted, Lauren A.; Gritsch, Hans A.; McGuire, Suzanne M.; Mone, Thomas D.; Veale, Jeffrey L.
• Is Part Of: Transplant international. Volume 27:Number 11(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1175
• Page End: 1182
• Publication Date: 2014-09-22
• Subjects: Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; 617.95405
• DOI: 10.1111/tri.12405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0934-0874

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="tri12405-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>The disparity between kidney transplant candidates and donors necessitates innovations to increase organ availability. Transporting kidneys allows for living donors and recipients to undergo surgery with a familiar transplant team, city, friends, and family. The effect of shipping kidneys and prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) with living donor transplantation outcomes is not clearly known. This retrospective matched (age, gender, race, and year of procedure) cohort study compared allograft outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants and nonshipped living donor kidney transplants. Fifty‐seven shipped live donor kidneys were transplanted from 31 institutions in 26 cities. The mean shipping distance was 1634 miles (range 123–2811) with mean CIT of 12.1 ± 2.8 h. The incidence of delayed graft function in the shipped cohort was 1.8% (1/57) compared to 0% (0/57) in the nonshipped cohort. The 1‐year allograft survival was 98% in both cohorts. There were no significant differences between the mean serum creatinine values or the rates of serum creatinine decline in the immediate postoperative period even after adjusted for gender and differences in recipient and donor BMI. Despite prolonged CITs, outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants were similar when compared to matched nonshipped living donor kidney transplants.</p> </abstract>