Litter elemental stoichiometry and biomass densities of forest soil invertebrates. Issue 10 (28th August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ott, David; Digel, Christoph; Klarner, Bernhard; Maraun, Mark; Pollierer, Melanie; Rall, Björn C.; Scheu, Stefan; Seelig, Gesine; Brose, Ulrich
• Is Part Of: Oikos. Volume 123:Issue 10(2014)
• Page Start: 1212
• Page End: 1223
• Publication Date: 2014-08-28
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; 570
• DOI: 10.1111/oik.01670
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0030-1299

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>To maintain constant chemical composition, i.e. elemental homeostasis, organisms have to consume resources of sufficient quality to meet their own specific stoichiometric demand. Therefore, concentrations of elements indicate resource quality, and rare elements in the environment may act as limiting factors for individual organisms scaling up to constrain population densities. We investigated how the biomass densities of invertebrate populations of temperate forest soil communities depend on 1) the stoichiometry of the basal litter according to ecological stoichiometry concepts and 2) the population average body mass as predicted by metabolic theory. We used a large data set on biomass densities of 4959 populations across 48 forests in three regions of Germany. Following various ecological stoichiometry hypotheses, we tested for effects of the carbon‐to‐element ratios of 10 elements. Additionally, we included the abiotic litter characteristics habitat size (represented by litter depth), litter diversity and pH, as well as forest type as an indicator for human management. Across 12 species groups, we found that the biomass densities scaled significantly with population‐averaged body masses thus supporting metabolic theory. Additionally, 10 of these allometric scaling relationships exhibited interactions with stoichiometric and abiotic co‐variables. The four most frequent co‐variables were 1) forest type, 2) the carbon‐to‐phosphorus ratio (C:P), 3) the carbon‐to‐sodium ratio (C:Na), and the carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio (C:N). Hence, our analyses support the sodium shortage hypothesis for microbi‐detritivores, the structural elements hypothesis for some predator groups (concerning N), and the secondary productivity hypothesis (concerning P) across all trophic groups in our data. In contrast, the ecosystem size hypothesis was only supported for some meso‐ and macrofauna detritivores. Our study is thus providing a comprehensive analysis how the elemental stoichiometry of the litter as the basal resource constrain population densities across multiple trophic levels of soil communities.</p> </abstract>