Predation on freshwater snails in Miocene Lake Steinheim: a trigger for intralacustrine evolution?. (23rd June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rasser, Michael W.; Covich, Alan P.
• Is Part Of: Lethaia. Volume 47:Number 4(2014:Dec.)
• Page Start: 524
• Page End: 532
• Publication Date: 2014-06-23
• Subjects: Paleontology -- Periodicals; Geology, Stratigraphic -- Periodicals; 560
• DOI: 10.1111/let.12078
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0024-1164

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="let12078-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Shells of the freshwater gastropods <italic>Gyraulus trochiformis</italic> (Planorbidae or ramshorn snails) and <italic>Bania pseudoglobula</italic> (formerly <italic>Pseudamnicola</italic>, Hydrobiidae) from Miocene Steinheim Basin in SW Germany contain small holes with a mean diameter of 0.8 mm. Analyses of comparable holes are so far unknown from fossil or extant assemblages of freshwater shells. This analysis of the perforated shells suggests that the holes were not formed by post‐depositional or pure taphonomic processes. Instead, they were most likely produced by predators. This analysis widens the means for identification of predation on freshwater snail shells that can be used in other palaeolimnological studies. The co‐occurrence of fish teeth and perforated shells in the studied samples as well as the perforation features suggest that the predator was either barbel or tench fish. The correlation between shell sizes and hole diameters suggests a size relationship between predator and prey that may generally be related to gape‐limited fish predators. The co‐occurrence of perforated shells in these lake sediments with a dominance of large and armoured shells suggest that these larger shells with protuberances and knobs could not be crushed by the gape‐limited fish predators. This analysis is the basis for a hypothesis that the endemic evolution of <italic>Gyraulus</italic> in Lake Steinheim, with some varied forms of shell thickness and morphology, was triggered by a predator–prey relationship based on adaptations to avoid shell‐breaking predators.</p> </abstract>