Evaluation of a novel methacrylate‐based protein a resin for the purification of immunoglobulins and Fc‐fusion proteins. (24th July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McCaw, Tyler R.; Koepf, Edward K.; Conley, Lynn
• Is Part Of: Biotechnology progress. Volume 30:Number 5(2014)
• Page Start: 1125
• Page End: 1136
• Publication Date: 2014-07-24
• Subjects: Biotechnology -- Periodicals; Food industry and trade -- Periodicals; Bioengineering -- Periodicals; 660.6
• DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1951
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8756-7938

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Protein A affinity chromatography is a central part of most commercial monoclonal antibody and Fc‐fusion protein purification processes. In the last couple years an increasing number of new Protein A technologies have emerged. One of these new Protein A technologies consists of a novel, alkaline‐tolerant, Protein A ligand coupled to a macroporous polymethacrylate base matrix that has been optimized for immunoglobulin (Ig) G capture. The resin is interesting from a technology perspective because the particle size and pore distribution of the base beads are reported to have been optimized for high IgG binding and fast mass transfer, while the Protein A ligand has been engineered for enhanced alkaline tolerance. This resin was subjected to a number of technical studies including evaluating dynamic and static binding capacities, alkaline stability, Protein A leachate propensity, impurity clearance, and pressure–flow behavior. The results demonstrated similar static binding capacities as those achieved with industry standard agarose Protein A resins, but marginally lower dynamic binding capacities. Removal of impurities from the process stream, particularly host cell proteins, was molecule dependent, but in most instances matched the performance of the agarose resins. This resin was stable in 0.1 M NaOH for at least 100 h with little loss in binding capacity, with Protein A ligand leakage levels comparable to values for the agarose resins. Pressure–flow experiments in lab‐scale chromatography columns demonstrated minimal resin compression at typical manufacturing flow rates. Prediction of resin compression in manufacturing scale columns did not suggest any pressure limitations upon scale up. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers <italic>Biotechnol. Prog</italic>., 30:1125–1136, 2014</p> </abstract>