Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A Western perspective. Issue 2 (4th October 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A Western perspective. Issue 2 (4th October 2013)
- Main Title:
- Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A Western perspective
- Authors:
- Sullivan, Kevin M.
Groeschl, Ryan T.
Turaga, Kiran K.
Tsai, Susan
Christians, Kathleen K.
White, Sarah B.
Rilling, William S.
Pilgrim, Charles H.C.
Gamblin, T. Clark - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background and Objectives</title> <p>Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is simple, inexpensive, and has been proposed to be predictive in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Europe and Asia. We aimed to evaluate whether NLR at presentation in a Western center provides any prognostic value compared to other common prognostic scores.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>NLR was calculated for 75 consecutive patients at presentation with HCC and regression models were used to analyze its value for predicting treatment strategy and short‐term survival with Child‐Pugh and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD).</p> </sec> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>NLR was not predictive of future treatment regimens with hepatectomy, liver transplant, or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE; odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71–1.02, <italic>P</italic> = 0.079) as compared the predictive value of MELD (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.72–0.93, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002) or Child‐Pugh (OR: 0.48, CI: 0.34–0.69, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Adding additional adjustment for treatment, NLR did not correlate with short‐term overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09, CI: 0.95–1.24, <italic>P</italic> = 0.227). MELD also did not correlate with overall survival (HR: 1.04, CI:<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background and Objectives</title> <p>Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is simple, inexpensive, and has been proposed to be predictive in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Europe and Asia. We aimed to evaluate whether NLR at presentation in a Western center provides any prognostic value compared to other common prognostic scores.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>NLR was calculated for 75 consecutive patients at presentation with HCC and regression models were used to analyze its value for predicting treatment strategy and short‐term survival with Child‐Pugh and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD).</p> </sec> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>NLR was not predictive of future treatment regimens with hepatectomy, liver transplant, or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE; odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71–1.02, <italic>P</italic> = 0.079) as compared the predictive value of MELD (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.72–0.93, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002) or Child‐Pugh (OR: 0.48, CI: 0.34–0.69, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Adding additional adjustment for treatment, NLR did not correlate with short‐term overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09, CI: 0.95–1.24, <italic>P</italic> = 0.227). MELD also did not correlate with overall survival (HR: 1.04, CI: 0.96–1.13, <italic>P</italic> = 0.357) whereas Child‐Pugh (HR: 1.56, CI: 1.10–2.19, <italic>P</italic> = 0.011) was predictive.</p> </sec> <sec id="jso23448-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This study does not support the prognostic value of NLR to guide therapy for HCC in a Western center, whereas MELD and Child‐Pugh score were more predictive. <italic>J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:95–97</italic>. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of surgical oncology. Volume 109:Issue 2(2014:Feb. 01)
- Journal:
- Journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 109:Issue 2(2014:Feb. 01)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0109-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 95
- Page End:
- 97
- Publication Date:
- 2013-10-04
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9098 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jso.23448 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-4790
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5067.380000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3513.xml