"I don't know why I'm here": from knot‐working to not‐knowing. Issue 2 (2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- "I don't know why I'm here": from knot‐working to not‐knowing. Issue 2 (2014)
- Main Title:
- "I don't know why I'm here": from knot‐working to not‐knowing
- Authors:
- Charlotte Wegener
- Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve"> Abstract </x> </title> <p> <bold>Purpose</bold> – The purpose of this paper is to examine the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing the initial research question. <bold>Design/methodology/approach</bold> – The paper presents field notes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – "knot‐working" as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infuses another theoretical concept – "not‐knowing" as proposed by Lather (2007). <bold>Findings</bold> – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson and Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not‐knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory. <bold>Originality/value</bold> – The paper questions the initial research question: "How is the elderly care sector affected by innovation imperatives, " and ends up posing the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected – or how could they be<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve"> Abstract </x> </title> <p> <bold>Purpose</bold> – The purpose of this paper is to examine the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing the initial research question. <bold>Design/methodology/approach</bold> – The paper presents field notes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – "knot‐working" as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infuses another theoretical concept – "not‐knowing" as proposed by Lather (2007). <bold>Findings</bold> – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson and Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not‐knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory. <bold>Originality/value</bold> – The paper questions the initial research question: "How is the elderly care sector affected by innovation imperatives, " and ends up posing the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected – or how could they be affected – by the notion of care.</p> <ack> <title> <x xml:space="preserve"> Acknowledgements </x> </title> <p>The author wishes to thank Mike Rowe and two reviewers for encouragement and constructive comments on an earlier version of the paper.</p> </ack> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of organizational ethnography. Volume 3:Issue 2(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of organizational ethnography
- Issue:
- Volume 3:Issue 2(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0003-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 246
- Page End:
- 258
- Publication Date:
- 2014
- Subjects:
- Corporate culture -- Periodicals
Business anthropology -- Periodicals
Organizational sociology -- Periodicals
Organizational behavior -- Periodicals
302.35 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=JOE ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/JOE-07-2013-0016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2046-6749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3726.xml