Full‐halo coronal mass ejections: Arrival at the Earth. Issue 7 (2nd July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shen, Chenglong; Wang, Yuming; Pan, Zonghao; Miao, Bin; Ye, Pinzhong; Wang, S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 119:Issue 7(2014:Jul.)
• Page Start: 5107
• Page End: 5116
• Publication Date: 2014-07-02
• Subjects: Magnetospheric physics -- Periodicals; Space environment -- Periodicals; Cosmic physics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Atmospheres -- Periodicals; Heliosphere (Astrophysics) -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 523.01
• DOI: 10.1002/2014JA020001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9380

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jgra51130-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="jgra51130-para-0001">A geomagnetic storm is mainly caused by a frontside coronal mass ejection (CME) hitting the Earth and then interacting with the magnetosphere. However, not all frontside CMEs can hit the Earth. Thus, which CMEs hit the Earth and when they do so are important issues in the study and forecasting of space weather. In our previous work, the deprojected parameters of the full‐halo coronal mass ejections (FHCMEs) that occurred from 1 March 2007 to 31 May 2012 were estimated, and there are 39 frontside events that could be fitted by the Graduated Cylindrical Shell model. In this work, we continue to study whether and when these frontside FHCMEs (FFHCMEs) hit the Earth. It is found that 59% of these FFHCMEs hit the Earth, and for central events, whose deviation angles <italic>ϵ</italic>, which are the angles between the propagation direction and the Sun‐Earth line, are smaller than 45°, the fraction increases to 75%. After checking the deprojected angular widths of the CMEs, we found that all of the Earth‐encountered CMEs satisfy a simple criterion that the angular width (<italic>ω</italic>) is larger than twice the deviation angle (<italic>ϵ</italic>). This result suggests that some simple criteria can be used to forecast whether a CME could hit the Earth. Furthermore, for Earth‐encountered CMEs, the transit time is found to be roughly anticorrelated with the deprojected velocity, but some events significantly deviate from the linearity. For CMEs with similar velocities, the differences of their transit times can be up to several days. Such deviation is further demonstrated to be mainly caused by the CME geometry and propagation direction, which are essential in the forecasting of CME arrival.</p> </abstract>