Feasibility of and rectal dosimetry improvement with the use of SpaceOAR® hydrogel for dose‐escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy. Issue 4 (3rd March 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Feasibility of and rectal dosimetry improvement with the use of SpaceOAR® hydrogel for dose‐escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy. Issue 4 (3rd March 2014)
- Main Title:
- Feasibility of and rectal dosimetry improvement with the use of SpaceOAR® hydrogel for dose‐escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy
- Authors:
- van Gysen, Kirsten
Kneebone, Andrew
Alfieri, Florencia
Guo, Linxin
Eade, Thomas - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of injecting a temporary spacer between the rectum and the prostate and to quantify the degree of rectal dosimetric improvement that might result.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Ten patients underwent CT and MRI before and after injection of 10 cc of hydrogel and at completion of radiotherapy. Hydrogel was injected under general anaesthetic using a transperineal approach. The primary endpoints were perioperative toxicity and rectal dosimetry (V80, V75, V70, V65, V40 and V30). Secondary endpoints were acute gastrointestinal toxicity during and 3 months following radiotherapy and the stability of the hydrogel. Treatment for all patients was planned incorporating volumetric modulated arc therapy with a D95 of 80 Gy in 40 fractions to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles on both the pre‐ and post‐hydrogel scans. Toxicity was scored with the Common Terminology Criteria, v. 3.0.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In the first 24 h, two patients described an increase in bowel movement frequency. The comparison plans had identical prescription doses. Rectal doses were significantly lower for all hydrogel patients for all dose endpoints (V80 = 7% vs. 0.1%, V75 = 10.3% vs. 1.1%,<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of injecting a temporary spacer between the rectum and the prostate and to quantify the degree of rectal dosimetric improvement that might result.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Ten patients underwent CT and MRI before and after injection of 10 cc of hydrogel and at completion of radiotherapy. Hydrogel was injected under general anaesthetic using a transperineal approach. The primary endpoints were perioperative toxicity and rectal dosimetry (V80, V75, V70, V65, V40 and V30). Secondary endpoints were acute gastrointestinal toxicity during and 3 months following radiotherapy and the stability of the hydrogel. Treatment for all patients was planned incorporating volumetric modulated arc therapy with a D95 of 80 Gy in 40 fractions to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles on both the pre‐ and post‐hydrogel scans. Toxicity was scored with the Common Terminology Criteria, v. 3.0.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In the first 24 h, two patients described an increase in bowel movement frequency. The comparison plans had identical prescription doses. Rectal doses were significantly lower for all hydrogel patients for all dose endpoints (V80 = 7% vs. 0.1%, V75 = 10.3% vs. 1.1%, V70 = 13.2% vs. 2.7%, V65 = 15.8% vs. 4.6%, V40 = 35.2% vs. 23.3%, V30 = 52.6% vs. 38.5%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Post‐treatment MRI showed gel stability. Grade 1 bowel toxicity was reported in six patients during radiotherapy and two patients at 3 months' follow‐up. No Grade 2 or Grade 3 acute bowel toxicity was reported.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12152-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>SpaceOAR hydrogel was successfully injected in 10 patients with minimal side effects. Rectal dosimetry was significantly improved in all patients. This study has been extended to 30 patients with longer follow‐up planned.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 58:Issue 4(2014:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 58:Issue 4(2014:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 58, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 58
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0058-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 511
- Page End:
- 516
- Publication Date:
- 2014-03-03
- Subjects:
- Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals
Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1754-9485 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1754-9485.12152 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1754-9477
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5017.072080
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3673.xml