Effects of age and expertise on tactile learning in humans. (26th May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reuter, Eva‐Maria; Voelcker‐Rehage, Claudia; Vieluf, Solveig; Godde, Ben
• Is Part Of: European journal of neuroscience. Volume 40:Number 3(2014:Aug.)
• Page Start: 2589
• Page End: 2599
• Publication Date: 2014-05-26
• Subjects: Nervous system -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12629
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-816X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ejn12629-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Repetitive tactile stimulation is a well‐established tool for inducing somatosensory cortical plasticity and changes in tactile perception. Previous studies have suggested that baseline performance determines the amount of stimulation‐induced learning differently in specific populations. Older adults with lower baseline performance than young adults, but also experts, with higher baseline performance than non‐experts of the same age, have been found to profit most from such interventions. This begs the question of how age‐related and expertise‐related differences in tactile learning are reflected in neurophysiological correlates. In two experiments, we investigated how tactile learning depends on age (experiment 1) and expertise (experiment 2). We assessed tactile spatial and temporal discrimination accuracy and event‐related potentials (ERPs) in 57 persons of different age and expertise groups before and after a 30‐min tactile stimulation intervention. The intervention increased accuracy in temporal (found in experiment 1) and spatial (found in experiment 2) discrimination. Experts improved more than non‐experts in spatial discrimination. Lower baseline performance was associated with higher learning gain in experts and non‐experts. After the intervention, P300 latencies were reduced in young adults and amplitudes were increased in late middle‐aged adults in the temporal discrimination task. Experts showed a steeper P300 parietal‐to‐frontal gradient after the stimulation. We demonstrated that tactile stimulation partially reverses the age‐related decline in late middle‐aged adults and increases processing speed in young adults. We further showed that learning gain depends on baseline performance in both non‐experts and experts. In experts, however, the upper limit for learning seems to be shifted to a higher level.</p> </abstract>