Antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident rosacea3. (6th July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident rosacea3. (6th July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident rosacea3
- Authors:
- Spoendlin, J.
Voegel, J.J.
Jick, S.S.
Meier, C.R. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjd12838-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Despite scarce evidence, use of calcium channel blockers is discouraged in patients with rosacea, whereas beta‐blockers are recommended as an off‐label treatment for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To study the association of the use of calcium channel blockers, beta‐blockers and other antihypertensive drugs with incident rosacea.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We conducted a matched case–control study of antihypertensive drugs and incident rosacea, using the U.K.‐based General Practice Research Database. Cases had an incident diagnosis of rosacea recorded between 1995 and 2009. Each case was matched to one control on age, sex, general practice and years of history on the database before the index date. Drug use was stratified by timing (≤ or &gt; 180 days before the index date) and duration (number of prescriptions) of drug exposure, in a multivariate conditional logistic regression model.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Among 53 927 cases and 53 927 controls, we observed odds ratios (ORs) around unity for calcium channel blockers across all strata, with a slightly decreased OR of 0·77 (95% CI 0·69–0·86) for current users of<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjd12838-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Despite scarce evidence, use of calcium channel blockers is discouraged in patients with rosacea, whereas beta‐blockers are recommended as an off‐label treatment for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To study the association of the use of calcium channel blockers, beta‐blockers and other antihypertensive drugs with incident rosacea.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We conducted a matched case–control study of antihypertensive drugs and incident rosacea, using the U.K.‐based General Practice Research Database. Cases had an incident diagnosis of rosacea recorded between 1995 and 2009. Each case was matched to one control on age, sex, general practice and years of history on the database before the index date. Drug use was stratified by timing (≤ or &gt; 180 days before the index date) and duration (number of prescriptions) of drug exposure, in a multivariate conditional logistic regression model.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Among 53 927 cases and 53 927 controls, we observed odds ratios (ORs) around unity for calcium channel blockers across all strata, with a slightly decreased OR of 0·77 (95% CI 0·69–0·86) for current users of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with ≥ 40 prescriptions. Among beta‐blockers, atenolol and bisoprolol yielded slightly decreased ORs across all exposure strata, whereas propranolol revealed ORs around 1·0, irrespective of timing and duration of exposure. Neither angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors nor angiotensin receptor blockers altered the relative rosacea risk.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjd12838-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Our data contradict the prevailing notion that calcium channel blockers increase the risk of rosacea. Beta‐blocker use was associated with a slightly decreased risk of rosacea, but the effect may be somewhat stronger in patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of dermatology. Volume 171:Number 1(2014:Jul.)
- Journal:
- British journal of dermatology
- Issue:
- Volume 171:Number 1(2014:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 171, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 171
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0171-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 130
- Page End:
- 136
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-06
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133 ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjd ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjd.12838 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0963
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4157.xml