Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study). Issue 9 (30th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study). Issue 9 (30th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study)
- Authors:
- Bartels, S. A. L.
Vlug, M. S.
Hollmann, M. W.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Ubbink, D. T.
Cense, H. A.
van Wagensveld, B. A.
Engel, A. F.
Gerhards, M. F.
Bemelman, W. A.
the Collaborative LAFA Study Group
Cuesta, M. A.
van Geloven, A. A. W.
van der Zaag, E. S.
Wind, J.
Preckel, B.
Bossuyt, P.
Gouma, D.
Sprangers, M.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Tanis, P. J.
Buskens, C. J.
van Lenthe, I. Picard
Bakker, C.
DeJong, C. H.
van Dam, R. M.
van der Peet, D.
van Zalingen, E.
Noordhuis, A.
Goei, T. H.
van Tets, W.
deWit, L.
Clevers, W.
Bieleman, A.
Coenen, L.
Bonekamp, E.
van Abeelen, J.
van Iterson‐de Jong, D.
Krombeen, M.
… (more) - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9585-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0001">Short‐term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium‐ to long‐term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0002">The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management <italic>versus</italic> standard care) were reviewed 2–5 years after randomization for incisional hernia, adhesional small bowel obstruction (SBO), overall survival, cancer recurrence and quality of life (QoL). The laparoscopic and open groups were compared irrespective of fast‐track or standard perioperative care.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0003">Data on incisional hernias, SBO, survival and recurrence were available for 399 of 400 patients: 208 laparoscopic and 191 open resections. These outcomes were corrected for duration of follow‐up. Median follow‐up was 3·4 (i.q.r. 2·6–4·4) years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that open resection was a risk factor for incisional hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2·44, 95 per cent confidence interval<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9585-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0001">Short‐term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium‐ to long‐term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0002">The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management <italic>versus</italic> standard care) were reviewed 2–5 years after randomization for incisional hernia, adhesional small bowel obstruction (SBO), overall survival, cancer recurrence and quality of life (QoL). The laparoscopic and open groups were compared irrespective of fast‐track or standard perioperative care.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0003">Data on incisional hernias, SBO, survival and recurrence were available for 399 of 400 patients: 208 laparoscopic and 191 open resections. These outcomes were corrected for duration of follow‐up. Median follow‐up was 3·4 (i.q.r. 2·6–4·4) years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that open resection was a risk factor for incisional hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2·44, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·12 to 5·26; <italic>P</italic> = 0·022) and SBO (OR 3·70, 1·07 to 12·50; <italic>P</italic> = 0·039). There were no differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·80; <italic>P</italic> = 0·730) or in cumulative incidence of recurrence (<italic>P</italic> = 0·514) between the laparoscopic and open groups. There were no measured differences in QoL in 281 respondents (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0·350 for all scales).</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9585-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p id="bjs9585-para-0004">Laparoscopic colonic surgery led to fewer incisional hernia and adhesional SBO events. Registration number: NTR222 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.trialregister.nl" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://www.trialregister.nl</ext-link>).</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 101:Issue 9(2014:Sep.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 101:Issue 9(2014:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 101, Issue 9 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 101
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0101-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1153
- Page End:
- 1159
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-30
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9585 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3541.xml