Mountain gorilla ranging patterns: Influence of group size and group dynamics. Issue 8 (17th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Caillaud, Damien; Ndagijimana, Felix; Giarrusso, Anthony J.; Vecellio, Veronica; Stoinski, Tara S.
• Is Part Of: American journal of primatology. Volume 76:Issue 8(2014:Aug.)
• Page Start: 730
• Page End: 746
• Publication Date: 2014-02-17
• Subjects: Primates -- Periodicals; Primates -- Périodiques; 599.8
• DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22265
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0275-2565

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ajp22265-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Since the 1980s, the Virunga mountain gorilla population has almost doubled, now reaching 480 individuals living in a 430‐km<sup>2</sup> protected area. Analysis of the gorillas' ranging patterns can provide critical information on the extent and possible effects of competition for food and space. We analyzed 12 years of daily ranging data and inter‐group encounter data collected on 11 gorilla groups monitored by the Karisoke Research Center in Rwanda. During that period, the study population increased in size by almost 50% and the number of groups tripled. Groups had small yearly home ranges compared to other known gorilla populations, with an average 90% kernel density estimate of 8.07 km<sup>2</sup> and large between‐group variations (3.17–23.59 km<sup>2</sup>). Most groups had consistent home range location over the course of the study but for some, we observed gradual range shifts of up to 4 km. Neighboring groups displayed high home range overlap, which increased dramatically after the formation of new groups. On average, each group used only 28.6% of its 90% kernel home range exclusively, and in some areas up to six different groups had overlapping home ranges with little or no exclusive areas. We found a significant intra‐group positive relationship between the number of weaned individuals in a group and the home range size, but the fitted models only explained 17.5% and 13.7% of the variance in 50% and 90% kernel home range size estimates, respectively. This suggests that despite the increase in size, the study population is not yet experiencing marked effects of feeding competition. However, the increase in home range overlap resulting from the formation of new groups led to a sixfold increase in the frequency of inter‐group encounters, which exposes the population to elevated risks of fight‐related injuries and infanticide. Am. J. Primatol. 76:730–746, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>