Associations between perceptions of evidence and adoption of H1N1 influenza infection prevention strategies among healthcare workers providing care to persons with spinal cord injury. (16th December 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Associations between perceptions of evidence and adoption of H1N1 influenza infection prevention strategies among healthcare workers providing care to persons with spinal cord injury. (16th December 2013)
- Main Title:
- Associations between perceptions of evidence and adoption of H1N1 influenza infection prevention strategies among healthcare workers providing care to persons with spinal cord injury
- Authors:
- Ullrich, Philip M.
Lavela, Sherri L.
Evans, Charlesnika T.
Miskevics, Scott
Weaver, Frances M.
Goldstein, Barry - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="jan12336-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To examine associations between perceptions of evidence (research evidence, clinical expertise, patient preferences) and outcomes of a nationwide programme to implement H1N1 influenza prevention guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Healthcare workers do not consistently adhere to recommended infection control practices and this may be associated with their perceptions of evidence sources.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross‐sectional mailed survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>A survey of healthcare workers was administered in August 2010 after implementation of H1N1 prevention guidelines. Outcomes of interest were ratings of adherence to H1N1 prevention guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Findings</title> <p>Respondents with complete data (<italic>N </italic>=<italic> </italic>283) were included in analyses. Facility‐level adherence to guidelines was associated with opinions of clinical experts. Healthcare workers who rated clinical expertise as aligning with recommendations also rated their facilities as being more adherent to guidelines. Perceptions of research evidence and patient preferences were not associated<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jan12336-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To examine associations between perceptions of evidence (research evidence, clinical expertise, patient preferences) and outcomes of a nationwide programme to implement H1N1 influenza prevention guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Healthcare workers do not consistently adhere to recommended infection control practices and this may be associated with their perceptions of evidence sources.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross‐sectional mailed survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>A survey of healthcare workers was administered in August 2010 after implementation of H1N1 prevention guidelines. Outcomes of interest were ratings of adherence to H1N1 prevention guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Findings</title> <p>Respondents with complete data (<italic>N </italic>=<italic> </italic>283) were included in analyses. Facility‐level adherence to guidelines was associated with opinions of clinical experts. Healthcare workers who rated clinical expertise as aligning with recommendations also rated their facilities as being more adherent to guidelines. Perceptions of research evidence and patient preferences were not associated with facility adherence. Personal adherence was not associated with perceptions of evidence, except among those healthcare workers who rated both clinical experts and patients as unsupportive of guidelines; these practitioners were less likely to adhere to recommended personal hygiene practices.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12336-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Efforts to implement guidelines might be most effective when capitalizing on the influence of clinical experts. To better explain variability in guideline adherence, inclusion of a broader array of variables is recommended for future studies.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of advanced nursing. Volume 70:Number 8(2014:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Journal of advanced nursing
- Issue:
- Volume 70:Number 8(2014:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 70, Issue 8 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0070-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1793
- Page End:
- 1800
- Publication Date:
- 2013-12-16
- Subjects:
- Nursing -- Periodicals
610.7305 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jan.12336 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0309-2402
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4918.947000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3254.xml