Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. Issue 7 (2nd June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beniczky, Sándor; Conradsen, Isa; Moldovan, Mihai; Jennum, Poul; Fabricius, Martin; Benedek, Krisztina; Andersen, Noémi; Hjalgrim, Helle; Wolf, Peter
• Is Part Of: Epilepsia. Volume 55:Issue 7(2014:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1128
• Page End: 1134
• Publication Date: 2014-06-02
• Subjects: Epilepsy -- Periodicals; 616.853
• DOI: 10.1111/epi.12669
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0013-9580

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="epi12669-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="epi12669-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To investigate the characteristics of sustained muscle activation during convulsive epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), as compared to voluntary muscle activation. The main goal was to find surface electromyography (EMG) features that can distinguish between convulsive epileptic seizures and convulsive PNES.</p> </sec> <sec id="epi12669-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>In this case–control study, surface EMG was recorded from the deltoid muscles during long‐term video–electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in 25 patients and in 21 healthy controls. A total of 46 clinical episodes were recorded: 28 generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCS) from 14 patients with epilepsy, and 18 convulsive PNES from 12 patients (one patient had both GTCS and PNES). The healthy controls were simulating GTCS. To quantitatively characterize the signals we calculated the following parameters: root mean square (RMS) of the amplitude, median frequency (MF), coherence, and duration of the seizures, of the clonic EMG discharges, and of the silent periods between the cloni. Based on wavelet analysis, we distinguished between a low‐frequency component (LF 2–8 Hz) and a high‐frequency component (HF 64–256 Hz).</p> </sec> <sec id="epi12669-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Duration of the seizure, and separation between the tonic and the clonic phases distinguished at group‐level but not at individual level between convulsive PNES and GTCS. RMS, temporal dynamics of the HF/LF ratio, and the evolution of the silent periods differentiated between epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures at the individual level. A combination between HF/LF ratio and RMS separated all PNES from the GTCS. A blinded review of the EMG features distinguished correctly between GTCS and convulsive PNES in all cases. The HF/LF ratio and the RMS of the PNES were smaller compared to the simulated seizures.</p> </sec> <sec id="epi12669-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Significance</title> <p>In addition to providing insight into the mechanism of muscle activation during convulsive PNES, these results have diagnostic significance, at the individual level. Surface EMG features can accurately distinguish convulsive epileptic from nonepileptic psychogenic seizures, even in PNES cases without rhythmic clonic movements.</p> <p>A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.12669/supinfo" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">here</ext-link>.</p> </sec> </abstract>