Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas. (19th March 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas. (19th March 2014)
- Main Title:
- Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas
- Authors:
- Haga, Yoshio
Wada, Yasuo
Saitoh, Toshihiro
Takeuchi, Hitoshi
Ikejiri, Koji
Ikenaga, Masakazu - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The present study evaluated the utility of general surgical risk models to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in the specialty field of pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We investigated Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E‐PASS), its modified version (mE‐PASS), and Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P‐POSSUM) in 231 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy (Group A). We also analyzed E‐PASS and mE‐PASS in another cohort of the same procedures (Group B, <italic>n =</italic> 313).</p> </sec> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting in‐hospital mortality in Group A were moderate at 0.75 for E‐PASS, 0.69 for mE‐PASS, and 0.69 for P‐POSSUM. The predicted mortality rates of the models significantly correlated with severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.17, <italic>P</italic> = 0.011 for E‐PASS; ρ = 0.15, and <italic>P</italic> = 0.027 for P‐POSSUM). The AUCs were also moderate in Group B at 0.68 for E‐PASS and 0.69 for mE‐PASS. The predicted mortality rates significantly correlated with severity of postoperative<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The present study evaluated the utility of general surgical risk models to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in the specialty field of pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We investigated Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E‐PASS), its modified version (mE‐PASS), and Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P‐POSSUM) in 231 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy (Group A). We also analyzed E‐PASS and mE‐PASS in another cohort of the same procedures (Group B, <italic>n =</italic> 313).</p> </sec> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting in‐hospital mortality in Group A were moderate at 0.75 for E‐PASS, 0.69 for mE‐PASS, and 0.69 for P‐POSSUM. The predicted mortality rates of the models significantly correlated with severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.17, <italic>P</italic> = 0.011 for E‐PASS; ρ = 0.15, and <italic>P</italic> = 0.027 for P‐POSSUM). The AUCs were also moderate in Group B at 0.68 for E‐PASS and 0.69 for mE‐PASS. The predicted mortality rates significantly correlated with severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.18, <italic>P</italic> = 0.0018 for E‐PASS; ρ = 0.17, and <italic>P</italic> = 0.0022 for mE‐PASS).</p> </sec> <sec id="jhbp105-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The present study suggests that the predictive powers of general risk models may be moderate in pancreatic resections. A novel model would be desirable for these procedures.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. Volume 21:Number 8(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Number 8(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 8 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0021-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 599
- Page End:
- 606
- Publication Date:
- 2014-03-19
- Subjects:
- Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
617.556 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982 ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/121581 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhbp.105 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1868-6974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4997.660000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3980.xml