This is an interim version of our Electronic Legal Deposit Catalogue-eJournals and eBooks while we continue to recover from a cyber-attack.
Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph. Issue 6 (2nd June 2014)
Record Type:
Journal Article
Title:
Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph. Issue 6 (2nd June 2014)
Main Title:
Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph
<abstract abstract-type="short"> <title>Key Points</title> <p> <list id="wrcr20896-list-0001" list-type="bullet"> <list-item id="wrcr20896-li-0001"> <p>Celerity is faster than velocity</p> </list-item> <list-item id="wrcr20896-li-0002"> <p>Watershed models are evaluated only against celerity</p> </list-item> <list-item id="wrcr20896-li-0003"> <p>Velocity must be addressed in future watershed models</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </abstract>