Dermal exposure potential from textiles that contain silver nanoparticles. (July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stefaniak, Aleksandr B.; Duling, Mathew G.; Lawrence, Robert B.; Thomas, Treye A.; LeBouf, Ryan F.; Wade, Eleanor E.; Abbas Virji, M.
• Is Part Of: International journal of occupational and environmental health. Volume 20:Number 3(2014)
• Page Start: 220
• Page End: 234
• Publication Date: 2014-07
• Subjects: Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Industrial toxicology -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Consumer goods -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000070
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1077-3525

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>Factors that influence exposure to silver particles from the use of textiles are not well understood.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of product treatment and physiological factors on silver release from two textiles.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>Atomic and absorbance spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) were applied to characterize the chemical and physical properties of the textiles and evaluate silver release in artificial sweat and saliva under varying physiological conditions. One textile had silver incorporated into fiber threads (masterbatch process) and the other had silver nanoparticles coated on fiber surfaces (finishing process).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Several complementary and confirmatory analytical techniques (spectroscopy, microscopy, etc.) were required to properly assess silver release. Silver released into artificial sweat or saliva was primarily in ionic form. In a simulated "use" and laundering experiment, the total cumulative amount of silver ion released was greater for the finishing process textile (0·51±0·04%) than the masterbatch process textile (0·21±0·01%); <italic>P</italic><0·01.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>We found that the process (masterbatch vs finishing) used to treat textile fibers was a more influential exposure factor than physiological properties of artificial sweat or saliva.</p> </sec> </abstract>