Investigation of bioequivalence of a new fixed‐dose combination of acarbose and metformin with the corresponding loose combination as well as the drug–drug interaction potential between both drugs in healthy adult male subjects. (8th May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Investigation of bioequivalence of a new fixed‐dose combination of acarbose and metformin with the corresponding loose combination as well as the drug–drug interaction potential between both drugs in healthy adult male subjects. (8th May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Investigation of bioequivalence of a new fixed‐dose combination of acarbose and metformin with the corresponding loose combination as well as the drug–drug interaction potential between both drugs in healthy adult male subjects
- Authors:
- Kim, S.
Jang, I.‐J.
Shin, D.
Shin, D. S.
Yoon, S.
Lim, K. S.
Yu, K.‐S.
Li, J.
Zhang, H.
Liu, Y.
Brendel, E.
Blode, H.
Wang, Y. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="jcpt12166-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>What is known and objective</title> <p>Both metformin and acarbose are recommended monotherapy and add‐on therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A fixed‐dose combination (FDC) of acarbose and metformin has been developed to reduce pill burden and potentially improve compliance. The current study investigated the bioequivalence of the acarbose/metformin FDC compared with the individual agents administered simultaneously (loose combination). Secondary endpoints were the safety and tolerability of the FDC and the potential for drug–drug interactions between acarbose and metformin.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A single‐centre, randomized, open‐label, four‐period crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean subjects aged 18–45 years. Following one‐period balanced Williams design, participants were randomized to receive four single oral treatments on different study days separated by ≥7 days' washout. Treatments were as follows: (i) acarbose/metformin 50/500 mg FDC (test); (ii) acarbose 50 mg and metformin 500 mg as loose combination (reference); (iii) acarbose 50 mg; and (iv) metformin 500 mg. Serial blood samples were taken for glucose and insulin levels for 4 h after a sucrose load on the day before and day of study drug administration. Additionally, serial blood samples were<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jcpt12166-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>What is known and objective</title> <p>Both metformin and acarbose are recommended monotherapy and add‐on therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A fixed‐dose combination (FDC) of acarbose and metformin has been developed to reduce pill burden and potentially improve compliance. The current study investigated the bioequivalence of the acarbose/metformin FDC compared with the individual agents administered simultaneously (loose combination). Secondary endpoints were the safety and tolerability of the FDC and the potential for drug–drug interactions between acarbose and metformin.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A single‐centre, randomized, open‐label, four‐period crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean subjects aged 18–45 years. Following one‐period balanced Williams design, participants were randomized to receive four single oral treatments on different study days separated by ≥7 days' washout. Treatments were as follows: (i) acarbose/metformin 50/500 mg FDC (test); (ii) acarbose 50 mg and metformin 500 mg as loose combination (reference); (iii) acarbose 50 mg; and (iv) metformin 500 mg. Serial blood samples were taken for glucose and insulin levels for 4 h after a sucrose load on the day before and day of study drug administration. Additionally, serial blood samples were taken for analysis of metformin levels for 24 h after each drug containing metformin. The area under the curve for 4 h post‐test (AUC<sub>0–4 h</sub>) and the maximal serum concentration (<italic>C</italic><sub>max</sub>) of plasma glucose and serum insulin were primary pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and <italic>C</italic><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–last</sub> and AUC for metformin levels were primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The bioequivalence of the FDC to the loose combination was considered established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the baseline‐adjusted PD parameter ratios (test vs. reference) for plasma glucose and the PK parameter ratios for metformin fell completely within current acceptance limits (0·8–1·25).</p> </sec> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results and discussion</title> <p>Thirty‐three of 40 randomized subjects completed the study; five withdrew consent and two discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). The 24‐h plasma concentration–time curves of metformin and the 4‐h plasma glucose–time curves after acarbose/metformin FDC (test) and acarbose + metformin loose combination (reference) were almost superimposable. The geometric least squares (LS) mean of the Ratio<sub>AUC</sub> and <inline-formula><alternatives><inline-graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="ark:/27927/pghqb9v6jf" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" /><mml:math altimg="urn:x-wiley:02694727:media:jcpt12166:jcpt12166-math-0001" overflow="scroll" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Ratio</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo movablelimits="true">max</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:msub></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula> for plasma glucose after the FDC vs. loose combination, and the LS mean of the ratios in metformin AUC, AUC<sub>0–last</sub> and <italic>C</italic><sub>max</sub> were close to unity, and the 90% CI of all these parameters fell within the predefined equivalence range of 0·8–1·25, confirming bioequivalence. The metformin AUC was reduced by 26% and <italic>C</italic><sub>max</sub> by 34% after acarbose + metformin compared with metformin alone. Eight subjects (20·0%) reported AEs, but all were mild, and most were gastrointestinal, as expected for these agents. The incidence of AEs was not higher with the combinations vs. monotherapy.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcpt12166-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>What is new and conclusion</title> <p>These data demonstrate that the acarbose/metformin FDC is bioequivalent to the loose combination of these agents. Although acarbose slightly reduced the bioavailability of metformin, the accumulated evidence of the efficacy of this combination implies that this is clinically irrelevant. The observed AE profile was consistent with the established knowledge on the safety of the two drugs.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. Volume 39:Number 4(2014:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Number 4(2014:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0039-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 424
- Page End:
- 431
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05-08
- Subjects:
- Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals
Chemotherapy -- Periodicals
615 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2710 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jcpt.12166 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0269-4727
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.685000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3166.xml