Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data. Issue 6 (6th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data. Issue 6 (6th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data
- Authors:
- Zscheischler, Jakob
Michalak, Anna M.
Schwalm, Christopher
Mahecha, Miguel D.
Huntzinger, Deborah N.
Reichstein, Markus
Berthier, Gwenaëlle
Ciais, Philippe
Cook, Robert B.
El‐Masri, Bassil
Huang, Maoyi
Ito, Akihiko
Jain, Atul
King, Anthony
Lei, Huimin
Lu, Chaoqun
Mao, Jiafu
Peng, Shushi
Poulter, Benjamin
Ricciuto, Daniel
Shi, Xiaoying
Tao, Bo
Tian, Hanqin
Viovy, Nicolas
Wang, Weile
Wei, Yaxing
Yang, Jia
Zeng, Ning - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="gbc20167-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="gbc20167-para-0001">Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state‐of‐the‐art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global‐scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO<sub>2</sub> from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO<sub>2</sub> exchange are equally strongly<abstract abstract-type="main" id="gbc20167-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p id="gbc20167-para-0001">Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state‐of‐the‐art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global‐scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO<sub>2</sub> from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO<sub>2</sub> exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Global biogeochemical cycles. Volume 28:Issue 6(2014:Jun.)
- Journal:
- Global biogeochemical cycles
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Issue 6(2014:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 6 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0028-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 585
- Page End:
- 600
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-06
- Subjects:
- Biogeochemical cycles -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
577.1405 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-9224 ↗
http://www.agu.org/journals/gb/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/2014GB004826 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-6236
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4195.352000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3787.xml