Shared Decision‐Making in the Selection of Outpatient Analgesics for Older Individuals in the Emergency Department. Issue 5 (16th April 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Shared Decision‐Making in the Selection of Outpatient Analgesics for Older Individuals in the Emergency Department. Issue 5 (16th April 2013)
- Main Title:
- Shared Decision‐Making in the Selection of Outpatient Analgesics for Older Individuals in the Emergency Department
- Authors:
- Isaacs, Cameron G.
Kistler, Christine
Hunold, Katherine M.
Pereira, Greg F.
Buchbinder, Mara
Weaver, Mark A.
McLean, Samuel A.
Platts‐Mills, Timothy F. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="jgs12207-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To assess the relationship between older adults' perceptions of shared decision‐making in the selection of an analgesic to take at home for acute musculoskeletal pain and (1) patient satisfaction with the analgesic and (2) changes in pain scores at 1 week.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross‐sectional study.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Single academic emergency department.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Participants</title> <p>Individuals aged 65 and older with acute musculoskeletal pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Measurements</title> <p>Two components of shared decision‐making were assessed: information provided to the patient about the medication choice and patient participation in the selection of the analgesic. Optimal satisfaction with the analgesic was defined as being "a lot" satisfied. Pain scores were assessed in the ED and at 1 week using a 0‐to‐10 scale.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of 159 individuals reached by telephone, 111 met all eligibility criteria and completed the survey. Fifty‐two percent of participants reported<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="jgs12207-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To assess the relationship between older adults' perceptions of shared decision‐making in the selection of an analgesic to take at home for acute musculoskeletal pain and (1) patient satisfaction with the analgesic and (2) changes in pain scores at 1 week.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Cross‐sectional study.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Single academic emergency department.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Participants</title> <p>Individuals aged 65 and older with acute musculoskeletal pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Measurements</title> <p>Two components of shared decision‐making were assessed: information provided to the patient about the medication choice and patient participation in the selection of the analgesic. Optimal satisfaction with the analgesic was defined as being "a lot" satisfied. Pain scores were assessed in the ED and at 1 week using a 0‐to‐10 scale.</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of 159 individuals reached by telephone, 111 met all eligibility criteria and completed the survey. Fifty‐two percent of participants reported receiving information about pain medication options, and 31% reported participating in analgesic selection. Participants who received information were more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the pain medication than those who did not (67% vs 34%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; .001). Participants who participated in the decision were also more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the analgesic (71% vs 43%; <italic>P</italic> = .008) and had a greater average decrease in pain score (4.1 vs 2.9; <italic>P</italic> = .05). After adjusting for measured confounders, participants who reported receiving information remained more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the analgesic (63% vs 38%; <italic>P</italic> = .04).</p> </sec> <sec id="jgs12207-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Shared decision‐making in analgesic selection for older adults with acute musculoskeletal pain may improve outcomes.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Volume 61:Issue 5(2013:May)
- Journal:
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Issue 5(2013:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0061-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 793
- Page End:
- 798
- Publication Date:
- 2013-04-16
- Subjects:
- Geriatrics -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_date_range=1995-current&j_issn=0002-8614) ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1532-5415 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/Journals/issuelist.asp?journal=jgs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0002-8614;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jgs.12207 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-8614
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4686.300000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3129.xml