Deriving site‐specific soil clean‐up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes. (26th February 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Deriving site‐specific soil clean‐up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes. (26th February 2014)
- Main Title:
- Deriving site‐specific soil clean‐up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes
- Authors:
- Kuperman, Roman G
Siciliano, Steven D
Römbke, Jörg
Oorts, Koen
Fairbrother, Anne - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="ieam1513-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Although it is widely recognized that microorganisms are essential for sustaining soil fertility, structure, nutrient cycling, groundwater purification, and other soil functions, soil microbial toxicity data were excluded from the derivation of Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco‐SSL) in the United States. Among the reasons for such exclusion were claims that microbial toxicity tests were too difficult to interpret because of the high variability of microbial responses, uncertainty regarding the relevance of the various endpoints, and functional redundancy. Since the release of the first draft of the Eco‐SSL Guidance document by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 2003, soil microbial toxicity testing and its use in ecological risk assessments have substantially improved. A wide range of standardized and nonstandardized methods became available for testing chemical toxicity to microbial functions in soil. Regulatory frameworks in the European Union and Australia have successfully incorporated microbial toxicity data into the derivation of soil threshold concentrations for ecological risk assessments. This article provides the 3‐part rationale for including soil microbial processes in the development of soil clean‐up values (SCVs): 1) presenting a brief overview of relevant test methods for assessing microbial functions in soil, 2) examining data<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="ieam1513-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Although it is widely recognized that microorganisms are essential for sustaining soil fertility, structure, nutrient cycling, groundwater purification, and other soil functions, soil microbial toxicity data were excluded from the derivation of Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco‐SSL) in the United States. Among the reasons for such exclusion were claims that microbial toxicity tests were too difficult to interpret because of the high variability of microbial responses, uncertainty regarding the relevance of the various endpoints, and functional redundancy. Since the release of the first draft of the Eco‐SSL Guidance document by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 2003, soil microbial toxicity testing and its use in ecological risk assessments have substantially improved. A wide range of standardized and nonstandardized methods became available for testing chemical toxicity to microbial functions in soil. Regulatory frameworks in the European Union and Australia have successfully incorporated microbial toxicity data into the derivation of soil threshold concentrations for ecological risk assessments. This article provides the 3‐part rationale for including soil microbial processes in the development of soil clean‐up values (SCVs): 1) presenting a brief overview of relevant test methods for assessing microbial functions in soil, 2) examining data sets for Cu, Ni, Zn, and Mo that incorporated soil microbial toxicity data into regulatory frameworks, and 3) offering recommendations on how to integrate the best available science into the method development for deriving site‐specific SCVs that account for bioavailability of metals and metalloids in soil. Although the primary focus of this article is on the development of the approach for deriving SCVs for metals and metalloids in the United States, the recommendations provided in this article may also be applicable in other jurisdictions that aim at developing ecological soil threshold values for protection of microbial processes in contaminated soils. <italic>Integr Environ Assess Manag</italic> 2014;10:388–400. © 2014 The Authors. <italic>Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management</italic> published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Integrated environmental assessment and management. Volume 10:Number 3(2014:Jul.)
- Journal:
- Integrated environmental assessment and management
- Issue:
- Volume 10:Number 3(2014:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 10, Issue 3 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0010-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 388
- Page End:
- 400
- Publication Date:
- 2014-02-26
- Subjects:
- Environmental management -- Periodicals
Pollution -- Periodicals
Environmental toxicology -- Periodicals
Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals
Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals
628 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bioone.org/loi/ieam ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1551-3793 ↗
http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-archive&issn=1551-3777 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ieam.1513 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1551-3777
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4531.815100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3565.xml