Assessing the Quality and Usability of Smartphone Apps for Pain Self‐Management. Issue 6 (14th January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reynoldson, Charmian; Stones, Catherine; Allsop, Matthew; Gardner, Peter; Bennett, Michael I.; Closs, S. José; Jones, Rick; Knapp, Peter
• Is Part Of: Pain medicine. Volume 15:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 898
• Page End: 909
• Publication Date: 2014-01-14
• Subjects: Pain -- Periodicals; Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Analgesics -- Periodicals; Pain -- Periodicals; Pain Management -- Periodicals; Douleur -- Périodiques; Douleur -- Traitement -- Périodiques; Analgésiques -- Périodiques; Analgésique; Soulagement de la douleur; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.047205
• DOI: 10.1111/pme.12327
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-2375

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To evaluate smartphone apps intended for self‐management of pain using quality assessment criteria and usability testing with prospective users.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>1) Survey and content analysis of available apps; and 2) individual usability study of two apps.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting</title> <p>University of Leeds, United Kingdom.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Participants</title> <p>Forty‐one participants (aged 19–59 years) with experience of chronic or recurrent pain episodes.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We undertook a survey, content analysis, and quality appraisal of all currently available mobile phone apps for self‐management of pain. Two apps were then selected and assessed with usability testing.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Twelve apps met the inclusion criteria. The quality assessment revealed wide variation in their clinical content, interface design, and usability to support self‐management of pain. Very little user or clinician involvement was identified in the development of the apps. From the usability testing, participants stated a preference for an interface design employing a lighter color scheme and particular text font. Although very few participants were aware of pain‐reporting apps prior to participation, many would consider use in the future.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme12327-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Variation in app quality and a lack of user and clinician engagement in development were found across the pain apps in this research. Usability testing identified a range of user preferences. Although useful information was obtained, it would be beneficial to involve users earlier in the process of development, as well as establishing ways to merge end user requirements with evidence‐based content, to provide high‐quality and usable apps for self‐management of pain.</p> </sec> </abstract>