Robotics in invasive cardiac electrophysiology. (July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shurrab, Mohammed; Schilling, Richard; Gang, Eli; Khan, Ejaz M; Crystal, Eugene
• Is Part Of: Expert review of medical devices. Volume 11:Number 4(2014)
• Page Start: 375
• Page End: 381
• Publication Date: 2014-07
• Subjects: Medical instruments and apparatus -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2014.916207
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-4440

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Robotic systems allow for mapping and ablation of different arrhythmia substrates replacing hand maneuvering of intracardiac catheters with machine steering. Currently there are four commercially available robotic systems. Niobe magnetic navigation system (Stereotaxis Inc., St Louis, MO) and Sensei robotic navigation system (Hansen Medical Inc., Mountain View, CA) have an established platform with at least 10 years of clinical studies looking at their efficacy and safety. AMIGO Remote Catheter System (Catheter Robotics, Inc., Mount Olive, NJ) and Catheter Guidance Control and Imaging (Magnetecs, Inglewood, CA) are in the earlier phases of implementations with ongoing feasibility and some limited clinical studies. This review discusses the advantages and limitations related to each existing system and highlights the ideal futuristic robotic system that may include the most promising features of the current ones.</p> </abstract>