Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom: Sensible Dialogue or a Bad Case of Strasbourg Jitters?. Issue 3 (May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lewis, Tom
• Is Part Of: Modern law review. Volume 77:Issue 3(2014)
• Page Start: 460
• Page End: 474
• Publication Date: 2014-05
• Subjects: Law -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 340
• DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12074
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0026-7961

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>In <italic>Animal Defenders International</italic> v <italic>United Kingdom</italic> a majority of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's statutory broadcasting ban on political advertisements under the Communications Act 2003 did not breach the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgment departs from the Court's established case law and, it is argued, raises several issues of concern both with regard to freedom of expression, and for human rights adjudication more generally. In particular, the Court's use of a doctrine of 'general measures' led it to place a great deal of reliance on the quality and quantity of legislative debate that preceded the UK ban, rather than its actual impact upon the applicant.</p> </abstract>