The Influence of the Precipitation/Ageing Temperature on a Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis from H2 and CO2. Issue 6 (29th April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Frei, Elias; Schaadt, Achim; Ludwig, Thilo; Hillebrecht, Harald; Krossing, Ingo
• Is Part Of: ChemCatChem. Volume 6:Issue 6(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 1721
• Page End: 1730
• Publication Date: 2014-04-29
• Subjects: Catalysis -- Periodicals; 541.39505
• DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201300665
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1867-3880

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>For heterogeneous catalysts, the constitution of the precursor is an important parameter to adjust the properties of the active catalyst. Therefore, we examined the influence of the temperature during the precipitation process and during the ageing time in the mother liquor for a Cu/ZnO/ZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst system obtained through a coprecipitation route. The variation of the temperature affects the ratio and crystallinity of the precursor phases zincian malachite and aurichalcite, as detected by powder XRD (phase and line width) and FTIR spectroscopy (characteristic asymmetric CO stretching modes of the carbonate anions at <tex-math notation="tex"><![CDATA[$\tilde \nu $]]></tex-math><inline-graphic xlink:href="ark:/27927/pghh51x8hh" mimetype="image" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" />=1600–1100 cm<sup>−1</sup>). Therefore, the precatalyst surface area (<italic>A</italic><sub>s, BET</sub>) and pore distribution are adjustable (i.e., <italic>A</italic><sub>s, BET</sub> of 190 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> was reached). The influence of the synthesis conditions on the catalysts activity for methanol production was analyzed and discussed up to the level of productivity/activity testing at 413/513 K and 40 bar total H<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> pressure. The best catalyst showed a methanol productivity of 9.16 mmol g<sub>cat</sub><sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> (513 K, 40 bar, and gas hourly space velocity=8000) and is better than an industrial catalyst tested under the same conditions (8.34 mmol g<sub>cat</sub><sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). However, despite considerable differences in the precursor and precatalyst structure and morphology, their influence on the methanol productivity is only small. This demonstrates that the active catalyst is formed under reaction conditions.</p> </abstract>